855 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 X C,5 年前I have encountered an odd problem with my browser that it loses connection every time I play an embedded media (e.g. YouTube) on a webpage. After scanning my computer and testing my addons one by one, I have found that the problem only exists when this addon is enabled. I have used this addon for quite some time and it is a recent problem.
Edit: I haven't been able to reproduce this issue since updating to the latest version today so I'm giving this addon 5 stars instead. It has been really helpful in keeping the URLs clean.开发者回应
发布于 5 年前Can you please describe your problem in more details. The best way to do this is to open an issue at the gitlab page of ClearURLs or email me to clearurls_1@kevinroebert.de and please add the log to your report. - 评分 5 / 5来自 sastanin,5 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12252317,5 年前Someone wrote below: "It has a box to batch clean a collection of dirty links, context menu to copy clean link."
I cannot find this option (or an option to see a list of dirty links at all) maybe because I do not have an entry for ClearURLs in the context menu, any possible reason for this ? Sometimes (but rarely) I have problems with GUI of addons because of my desktop resolution (my eyes are not the youngest anymore), the last thing I see at the bottom of the GUI is "Rule status up to date" (in German here), is this right ? Wondering why I do not have an entry in the context menu...
Edit: I just looked at pictures of the GUI at gitlab and there seems to be a section "Log" under "Rules" at the bottom indeed (which I cannot see) so my assumption was quite right (GUI just "too big" on my desktop), reduces the functionality of the addon unfortunately of course but no solution for this probably. But does this explain the missing entry in the context menu, too ?
Okay, I found the icon for cleaning links by adding them manually in a new window, is it possible to see a list of links blocked or cleaned by ClearURLs in the statistics or elsewhere on the other hand ?
Edit/reply to you answer: I cannot see the log button because of my desktop resolution but this is not very important.
Any idea why I do not get an entry in the context menu ? But I can live without this, too, addon seems to be very good anyway开发者回应
发布于 5 年前Thanks for your positive feedback.
Please have a look at our wiki: https://gitlab.com/KevinRoebert/ClearUrls/wikis/Interface/1.-Version-1.2.1.x
You have to activate the "Logging". Only then the "Log" button will appear in the UI.
Edit: If you can open the settings, replace the "settings.html" with "log.html" and you will be on the log page. But you must still activate the "Logging" function to see an entry. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13215575,5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Tan,5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13434365,5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Bout's Morgan,5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Ninja,5 年前Excellent addon for those who value privacy. It has a box to batch clean a collection of dirty links, context menu to copy clean link. It would be the best if it offers custom rules in future. You can always report it to the developer. He responds timely and efficiently.
开发者回应
发布于 5 年前Yes, it should work with google chat links. But if you want, you can open an issue (https://gitlab.com/KevinRoebert/ClearUrls/issues) with some examples and I will more deeply investigate.
Please check out if the behavior also occurs with the newest version 1.6.- 评分 5 / 5来自 Ilya Kashirin,6 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Naso,6 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Clemens Ratte-Polle,6 年前2022.10
does it remove this? : ?utm_source=
----
2020.03.23
does ClearURLs remove also Facebook-Tacking at the end of URLs like
¬if_id=
?__tn__=
&eid=
&fref=
&__xts__%5B0%5D=
etc
I see no effect.
-------------------
On Facebook no effect o_O
https://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse/?hc_ref=
Is there a Chrome extension?
.---
2018.01.26
unfortunately i cant reply to your answer below.
thx for your service :)
There is more to clean Facebook Links from Tracking-Signs:
Examples:
https://www.facebook.com/pagename/?refid=xx&xxx
?href
?ref
https://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse/posts/1876259352461789?__xts__
------------------
Just testet - does not do its job :(
Click here first post:
https://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse/
There still comes:
https://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse/?hc_ref**********开发者回应
发布于 6 年前Thanks for your positive feedback. I've updated the rule file. Now your facebook urls will be cleaned. There are existing a chrome version of this addon, but not officially on the chrome webstore. Please read on this article why: https://gitlab.com/KevinRoebert/ClearUrls/issues/86
The chrome version is available here for manually installation: https://gitlab.com/KevinRoebert/ClearUrls/tags?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search=_cv 开发者回应
发布于 6 年前Thank you for your positive feedback.
Can you please describe your problem in more details. The best way to do this is to write me an email to clearurls_1@kevinroebert.de and add the Log to the email.
Edit: I've fix the bug. Please visit our issue page for more informations (https://gitlab.com/KevinRoebert/ClearUrls/issues/99)- 评分 4 / 5来自 rosekitsune1,6 年前I use Firefox Nightly 62 64 bit on my Windows 10 April 2018 laptop. And I can't get CleanUrl 1.2.2.8 to work in privacy browsing. The icon shows up but... in the drop down menu I try to flip a switch on it flips but as soon as I... close the drop down menu the switch flips off and it does this every time, Also all the text below the name and version does not show up at all. And the Oops something went wrong button! shows up And this only happens when I'm in privacy browsing in non privacy browsing CleanUrl 1.2.2.8 works just fine. Thank you
开发者回应
发布于 6 年前Thanks for your positive feedback.
Unfortunately, this is a well-known bug of the WebExtensions API that we have no control over. We would have to rewrite the entire addon, so that the pop-up window is also displayed in private mode. But the addon still filter in private mode the URLs correctly, it just can not be displayed. Please also see the official Bugreport from Mozilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1329304
This "bug" annoys a lot of developers of addons, because it is an unnecessary limitation of Mozilla, which makes it very difficult for the developers to develop their addons. We may eventually rewrite the addon and try to work around that limitation. But that means very much work for us, for which we first have to find time.
EDIT: ClearURLs works in version 1.5a also in the private mode (Incognito). - 评分 5 / 5来自 grahamperrin,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Ed ,7 年前Kevin, I have run into another issue with ClearURLs. It seems to block the map on the left side of the property search result on zillow.com. This occurs when looking at a saved map search or a new map search. Could you please check this?
Maybe you could consider a way to allow the user to whitelist certain sites when issues like this crop up.开发者回应
发布于 7 年前Hi Ed, we've fix the issue. Please look at our github page. Here we're collecting all issues and upcoming projects.
Thanks for reporting and your positive feedback. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 11640498,7 年前ClearURLs is a must!
Why this and not other similar add-on?
Most of the other adds-on have around 13 rules to remove garbage fields. But ClearURLs has 65 rules to remove garbage fields and much of them are regex-rules (so the rule does not only block one field, it blocks all fields with the same structure). Also, ClearURLs is a open source.
If you are a kind of average user looking to improve privacy without loosing a decade studying a PhD in tech details... ClearURLs is the most complete ready-to-use plug-and-play alternative.
I would like to suggest future requests to the author:
1) To test the system performance impact of the 65 rules. I don't have know-how to distinguish if the 65 rules are indispensable. If "yes", then keep all and add more rules! But if some of them are exceptional and affects system resources/performance, then it could be interesting to prioritize system performance.
2) To evolve ClearURLs in an all-in-one add-on for URLs nasty issues ("clearing", "redirecting", "skipping" etc).
I perfectly understand the author' point of view, in the sense that some requests demand tons of work, not just for build the add-on, but also for keep it updated, supported etc. But from the user' point of view, less adds-on, less system resources, better performance etc... is always more than welcome and most desirable.
I will be more than happy to help donating for this kind of all-in-one add-on.
Congrats and thank you to the author!