LeechBlock NG 的评价
LeechBlock NG 作者: James Anderson
1,634 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 AMJC,7 个月前Best program for keeping me on track. Love the options for how to manage my social media so that I can pick and choose how I structure my time. Keep up the good work and I am also making a donation.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 goblin,7 个月前I don't even use the straight-up blocking function that much, even just the delay function works like a charm to keep a mindful eye on surfing and social media habits. Simple yet customizable and effective, this has got to be one of the add-ons I most often recommend to others
- 评分 5 / 5来自 baltagod,7 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18409152,7 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18408143,7 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 petrichorboi,7 个月前Very helpful as someone with ADHD! I like being able to allow different amounts of time for different sites/groups of sites.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18405697,7 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18405663,7 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18404719,7 个月前Works just perfectly fine, especially when you are trying to build habits for yourself.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18311296,8 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Lunakri,8 个月前It's not a silver bullet against procrastination, but it is, like, a regular bullet, and those are pretty useful too
- 评分 5 / 5来自 acarimargo,8 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Sacnam,8 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 harley,8 个月前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Peter,8 个月前Time block is not optional.
Screen says 'Enter the time periods within which to block these sites (optional)'.
But leaving it empty makes the plugin to skip everything in the list. So not optional at all.开发者回应
发布于 8 个月前It is optional, because you can enter a time limit instead of time periods. If you don't enter either time periods or a time limit, then, of course, nothing will be blocked. You have to specify one or the other. Otherwise, how would the extension know when you want the sites blocked? - 评分 5 / 5来自 Pepper,8 个月前Excellent plugin for browser, but has become completely unusuable on mobile. Requires opening the extension and saving options again to get it to start blocking the current tab, which defeats the purpose.
edit: seems this is on Firefox's end, solution is possible by not using filters (I think)开发者回应
发布于 8 个月前Yeah, unfortunately there are issues with Firefox for Android: https://github.com/proginosko/LeechBlockNG/issues/419
Hoping to see a fix before too long. - 评分 3 / 5来自 Gentle,8 个月前We wrote about how this extension makes firefox unresponsive, though it kind of is our fault for having 20 000 tabs open.
The developer responded -immediately- with a fix which we really appreciate and were surprised by. They told us to go to enable a performance setting in the general tab, that only considers active tabs.
However, the fix didn't work. It made firefox a little more responsive, but in that we only had to wait one minute per interaction with the browser instead of three.开发者回应
发布于 8 个月前The other thing you could try is increasing the value of the "Process tabs every __ second(s)" option. With 20,000 tabs open (!) there's going to have to be a trade-off somewhere. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16211741,8 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Nick To,8 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 hyk,8 个月前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Raman singh,8 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 RowdytheNerd,8 个月前