a script that is marked "trusted" on one page, is also trusted on every other page, which is the same as "trusted globally".

if "disable restrictions globally (dangerous)" is
"dangerous" (in the programmers opinion), why is the "trusted" not bound to the specific page?

- page A does work without script X
- page B doesn't work without script X
(e.g. doubleclick, googleanalytics, googlestatics)

why would i want to allow script X on page A?

Fantastic in theory, and often in use, BUT one major issue for me. It takes time to allow each part of each site that you "trust". When your work requires you to interact with a lot of web sites, that adds up. All good, EXCEPT that on a regular basis, NoScript simply "loses" those entries. My sites stop working, and I have to go in a do it again for each. Remember too that it's not a matter of "trust this site", as a great many have good and bad mixed together. I personally go to at least dozens of sites that involve 5-15 different scripting sites, and have to sort out on each which are good and which are necessary to get the data I need. So it's a lot of work, but worth it, as long as my work isn't randomly discarded. Fix this, it's 5 stars. With the problem, it's closer to a "necessary evil".

Another user (mdontu) just detailed the same problem I have.

Usually this extension is absolutely great. I've been using it for years. However, for quite some time it seems to struggle with resetting large whitelists when Firefox is sync'd over multiple computers. Gets really frustrating when you have to re-whitelist sites that you know you have already whitelisted.

The problem seems to be getting worse. I think the developer may be aware of it, but this really should get addressed.

Très bien jusqu'à maintenant mais depuis la dernière mise à jour automatique : j'ai perdu tout le paramétrage constitué avec soin depuis des années.... Or le module ne permet pas à ma connaissance d'en faire une sauvegarde. Vu la complexité des sites et les tâtonnements nécessaires pour savoir ce qui doit être autorisé ou non, c'est un défaut majeur.

Something went off this past week. Either with Firefox or the extension. I use Firefox Account on three separate computers, one of which I had to reinstall a few times. Now my list of trusted sites gets reset periodically (every few hours?). The rest of extensions seem do be doing fine, though, including the Multi-Account Containers which I know it uses the Firefox account to synchronize across installations.

このアドオンが有効だと、ファイルのダウンロードができなくなります。

安全なのはいいですが、いちいち許可しなくてはならず、面倒ですね。

ほかにも、ページが正常に表示されなくなったり...

これは、ほんとにセキュリティを重視する人や、危険そうなサイトに接続したいとき向けのアドオンです。
普通に快適なブラウジングをしたい人にはお勧めできません。

安全なのはすごい安全です。

I installed Noscript yesterday and am trying it out, but I'm about to un-install it because it breaks the two websites I use the most -- www.flickr.com and familysearch.org, even though I've put those addresses in the per-site permissions list.

flickr.com -- while the photos display, they are no longer selectable. Also, the statistics page no longer shows the usual graphs, etc. Also, the page width detection is now broken, so the photos are displayed as if they are on a narrow device instead of a desktop computer.

familysearch.org -- the main menu text and wrap-around stuff is displayed but there is no list of genealogy collections to select.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/ -- images on video thumbnails show the BBC logo on a grey background rather than the thumbnail image.

Really have the latest user interface. Earlier I could manage blocking specific scripts in a few clicks now it's buggy and totally charged

NoScript breaks some sites in Firefox 71.0b6, for example https://russian.rt.com/news

Non serve. È impossibile bloccare un javascript specifico.

pas simple à utiliser

Why does NoScript reset all my permission settings when I switch between Linux and Windows synced Firefox? A real nuisance!

So far so good

It works as it should, but the redesigned interface does not show the full script in the drop-down list which feels like I'm flying blind on what I'm allowing or blocking. I found better that works as well.

Sehr mächtig, häufig bin ich aber selbst ausgesperrt und muss NoScript deaktivieren.

Does it's job, but forgets its settings and allowed pages every few days, pretty annoying.

I wish it would have a button that could just make a website work. It's such a pain to have to manually fix every site with this extension. Please make it more user friendly.