NoScript 安全套件 的评价
NoScript 安全套件 作者: Giorgio Maone
2,311 条评价
- 评分 4 / 5来自 progan01,4 年前Up until Firefox 79, NoScript was an indispensable part of my security suite, handling intrusions and trouble scripts very well. But now either Firefox or NoScript does not remember my instructions from one session to the next, forcing me to re-approve privileges each time I revisit a site. I don't know why this is happening, but it's an enormous hindrance and a great timesuck. Can you look into this for me, Giorgio? Your product has been a Godsend to me, and I want to continue using it.
开发者回应
发布于 4 年前It's most likely this CCleaner bug: https://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16184636,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Zitronella,4 年前NoScript works perfect also on firefox 79.0
If it doesn't remember settings the reason could be CCleaner > Custom Clean > Applications > Firefox > “Internet Cache” option deletes all *.sqlite-shm, *.sqlite-wal,
see
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/07/09/changes-to-storage-sync-in-firefox-79/#comment-226931
That’s a bug in CCleaner, not in NoScript and not in Firefox.开发者回应
发布于 4 年前https://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - 评分 5 / 5来自 nenas1ya,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16136545,4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16103032,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15819827,4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 singh,4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 smluuvslm,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Pieta,4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 gep23,4 年前One of my best ratings. Recently, however, the permissions are no longer saved and I have to reassign them almost every session.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 user 735972,4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 theone,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14601750,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Татьяна,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 visika,4 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Dragganot33,4 年前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 MSpan,4 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 GT,4 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Andralon,4 年前a script that is marked "trusted" on one page, is also trusted on every other page, which is the same as "trusted globally".
if "disable restrictions globally (dangerous)" is
"dangerous" (in the programmers opinion), why is the "trusted" not bound to the specific page?
- page A does work without script X
- page B doesn't work without script X
(e.g. doubleclick, googleanalytics, googlestatics)
why would i want to allow script X on page A? - 评分 5 / 5来自 Fox the Apprentice,4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Thekoshin,5 年前