Shinigami Eyes 的评价
Shinigami Eyes 作者: Shinigami Eyes
Firefox 用户 17712108 的评价
评分 5 / 5
来自 Firefox 用户 17712108,2 年前885 条评价
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Alden,13 小时前I used it as a jumping off point for identifying transphobes. very useful as a "you should verify this" flag. however, more trans people/trans allies have been flagged as potentially dangerous recently, making it much less user-friendly.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 SardonicPlague,20 小时前I think the fact that the five star reviews that are being recently uploaded to combat the complaints being levied at Shinigami Eyes contain anti-transmasc language is almost proof in and of itself that these people are biased. If there are all these one-star reviews saying that you're being biased and all you can do to reply to accusations with more bias, you're probably a bit biased!
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Astral,20 小时前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 nepnym,1 天前i remember when using slurs was considered to be transphobic. the current problems are By Design, and have been for a while.
this is a disgustingly sexist terf extension downright lying about being community-friendly. i wouldnt be surprised if it came out in a few years it was a psyop to sow division within the community. this is the material effect it has -- i cant wrap my head around the intent.
the double standard and pattern of the terms on the rules page is, bad, to say the least.
1 star reviews now outnumber 5 star ones.
ill avoid making comments towards the creator, because anything i may say would get this review flagged -- i find the extension itself deserving of a red flag using its original, more fair ethos. the current rules page makes my blood boil.
as note (important): trying to find any further info on the current maintainer, etc, anything/anyone to contact further leads to a lot of bad/weird/harmful misinfo! this is separate and only towards the practice of the extension. there is no minority where it is suddenly appropriate to use hate speech.
i was the first person to open an issue on the gh about this -- so i guess ill stack on to the 1 star reviews, if this helps anyone. i really hope this problem can be fixed because of the large size of the userbase (this extension is even in papers!), so it's sad to see this change.
and -- as an important note -- based off some of the dev responses to reviews -- afab transfem is for intersex people. agab terminology is for intersex people, and appropriating it to exclude intersex experiences is, needless to say, Bad. and its also not trans friendly, because it explicitly, and i cannot stress this enough, excludes a specific Kind of trans person (in a way that is bioessentialist! there's nothing noted about amab transmascs is there? and if there was -- i'd be complaining about that too!).
to specifically flag and exclude afab transfems from the community would be to say that the only trans people who matter are perisex. to only highlight specific hate terms against non-binary and perisex transmasculine people as being ok to use would be to imply that the only community experiences that matter are those of transfems -- and that the only people trans enough to deserve protecting -- are transfem.
anything less than "all trans people" (by demographic) is transphobic. i dont know why we cant spotlight the struggles and oppression against one group without specifically putting down and excluding another group. it speaks poorly of transmisogyny as a concept to use it as a bludgeoning tool to silence more vulnerable members of the community, even those who are transfem. im tired. - 评分 1 / 5来自 kanagan,1 天前usually super useful but ive been seeing a weird amount of people flagged as red that have nothing transphobic on their accounts (a lot of them trans themselves and not the reactionary conservative types either) recently. i don't know if they turned over verification to AI but maybe the system needs to be revised because it's really affecting how much i can trust the extension.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 s1llyb33tle,1 天前used to be a decent tool, now the moderation team seem to have lost it and are marking innocent people -- especially intersex folk, transmen, trans poc and others -- as transphobic. the moderators are discriminatory and are tearing the community apart; don't trust this extension anymore
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18745061,1 天前I used to trust this addon but the recent changes have rendered its point moot. Back to individual manual filtering we go.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18744322,2 天前Used to love this but then they started marking innocent people for sharing their intersex experiences
- 评分 1 / 5来自 cirose,2 天前A few days ago I uninstalled this extension, and yesterday it suddenly was installed again. And now it says I can't uninstall it. (There are ways to do it, but I can't do it from the extensions settings page like usual). I liked what this addon offered origianally, but it has lost the thread and I will not support their current efforts. Now I have to go figure out how to pull this out of my browser.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 ballism32,2 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 minty,2 天前I got this extension to identify TERFs, not trans people with heterodox opinions on whether trans men count as oppressed or not. I'm only even keeping it so I can remove these false flags, but I don't recommend anyone download it for any other purpose.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18743572,2 天前"transmascs" gotta be one of the most fembrained and sensitive individuals lmfao
- 评分 1 / 5来自 gabe,3 天前used to be decent, now people i personally know who are trans themselves are getting flagged for talking about intersex issues and transmasc folk. biased developers
- 评分 1 / 5来自 marquesa.loving.kitsune,3 天前why are trans men and poc trans people flagged red over talking about their own experiences? why are intersex people flagged red for talking about their experiences?
i thought this addon was supposed to help trans people protect themselves from transphobes but it really is being used to protect only white trans women's and their fragile egos
time to go back to ye olden times (or what everyone who doesn't use their pc for social media does anyways) - 评分 1 / 5来自 JB,3 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 BLABLABLA,3 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 M. R.,3 天前I'm blocking more people flagged in green who are actually being transphobic than ones in red, and somehow notable transphobes such as Elon Musk are never flagged red. What a sorry joke of an extension is this? Good riddance.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Skoolby,3 天前Someone really oughta make an alternative that isn't targeting intersex people and trans men, cool concept, horrible creator and/or moderators
- 评分 1 / 5来自 kittyacelia,4 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18125561,4 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Deimos,4 天前for those unaware, theres been a lot of intracommunity discourse about transmascs, and an attempt to find words to describe our unique experience with transphobia. a certain subset of the trans community has taken to calling every attempt to do so transmisogyny, and it appears the mod team have taken that side too. many of the users marked green are outright hateful about transmen, using words like "zippertits", "birthday boy" and "theyfab" to demean us and other members of the community who agree with us. there are also now a bunch of users unfairly marked as red, despite not being transphobic at all, and only stating that transmascs can be as oppressed as transfems. i have also heard of intersex people being unfairly marked, but i do not feel well read enough to fully get into that. overall its a huge shame this has been allowed to happen.