NoScript Security Suite 的評論
NoScript Security Suite 作者: Giorgio Maone
291 筆評論
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14976141,6 年前Leistet sehr gute Arbeit. Allerdings ist es sehr schwer die Skripte zu identifizieren, die man bedenkenlos ausführen lassen kann. Und manchmal geht selbst dann nichts, wenn man im Reiter alle Skripte erlaubt.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14931377,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14917778,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14877005,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14839883,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14836226,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14811431,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14764186,6 年前Eskiden vazgeçilmezimdi ama Basilisk arayüzünden vazgeçildikten sonra değişen arayüzü çok karmaşık gelmeye başladı ne yazık ki.
Bir de artık eskisi kadar sabit bir internet haritam olmadığı için her site için tek tek ayar yapmak beni yoruyor.
Ama en güvenlisini isteyenlere tavsiyemdir.
Bundan daha basiti ise daha sezgisel olan Privacy Badger zaten. - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14282235,6 年前As some others have mentioned, after the update all my settings for sites are gone. Please help!
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14712446,6 年前Have been using this for awhile and was very happy with it. However, the latest version has continuous popups for suspicious cross-scripting. I have had to disable Sanitize cross-site suspicious requests in order to use FF at all.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14667958,6 年前I give 4 stars but there is a glaring issue at work.
I have numerous computers and vm's that run NoScript. With Firefox sync enabled, they all keep completely losing their settings. This causes me to have to check off every single site over and over. I've tried the export/import, but that should not be necessary every time I enter a device that hasn't been used in a while. I don't know if this is a Firefox or NoScript issue, so I did not ding NoScript for that major issue. - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14642445,6 年前Absolutely great for security but a little annoying to keep adding exceptions. Please include a whilelist/blacklist setting so we can block specific domains instead of everything everywhere. It would be great if the settings could synchronize with sync too. There is a manual way to do it but it would be great to have that by default.
Thanks! - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Aurora of Earth,6 年前I've issues running NoScript on Firefox Nightly 67.0.
Sometimes it just seems not to store the data permanantly so I just have to set up the rules again and again. - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14638840,6 年前Does what its supposed to but the UI is shit and the icon looks like something from the Netscape era. I wish the developer would take a clue from ScriptBlock on chrome.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Holly Williams,6 年前I really enjoy this add on but I liked the old version better than this new version.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14616632,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14606018,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14304815,6 年前When I go on the web without it, on corporate machines running preferences-locked versions of IE and Chrome, it makes me so much happier to come back again to NoScript.
But I have some frustrations with it, like when I am using a web site and need some media to play--currently, trying to stream a sample of a song from Amazon before buying the album--and I've clicked 'temporarily allow/trust' to all 4 things that have such an option to click on the NoScript menu, and the song still does't play and there is still a 'stop' symbol with a 1 indicating that something else still must be given permission. And NoScript gives me no guidance on the 1 unfixable block. So I either disable NoScript for a few minutes, or use another browser. This is impolite, to block what I have explicitly asked it to allow. - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14508105,6 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14483362,6 年前The old version of NoScript is much easier to edit the whitelist, this new version need to edit the whitelist on the debug box.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Kelly Clowers,7 年前The WebExtention version doesn't yet have the power and flexibility of the old XUL version, but it gets the job done.