DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials 的評論
DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials 作者: DuckDuckGo
244 筆評論
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13343953,3 年前Used to recommend DDG to people and used it myself for years on all my devices. I have now switched to Brave everywhere. Privacy AND anti-censorship.
There is a false dichotomy that being anti-censorship means being Alex Jones 2.0. This makes it easy to dismiss people's complaints
Facebook censored a peer-reviewed articled published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the most respected medical journals. Lack of transparency for how something is branded "fake news" is worrying.
The most respected newspapers promoted the "WMD in Iraq" years ago. But I guess propaganda machine is cool when brown kids are killed instead of those bought by rich couple abroad (see news of kids from paid surrogacy stuck in Ukraine).
I am sure an underpaid intern knows better about what is disinformation and what is true. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 || BeeBee ||,3 年前DuckDuckGo used to stand for Internet privacy. You ask us "Why You Should Care" ... guess you are right as it turns out the you don't care much no more since starting to censor search results. You have just lost my confidence reveling that you have become a player in the great narrative. Shame on you guys!
- I used to really like DuckDuckGo but it joins the elite club of censoring.
The best way to fight disinformation and propaganda is to demistify it, argue it, present it and talk about it, analyse it and present the reality. This is not what DuckDuckGo seems to value. They would much rather down-rank searches from Russian media than let people forge their own opinions on the reality at hand.
A search engine taking party in a conflict is not just a political issue, but a poor sign that the search aspect only responds to what the owners of the engine want you to easily find rather than to leave you with an unfiltered list of what you are really looking for.
Currently, DuckDuckGo's search effectiveness on controversial topics now prove to be similar to that of Google's, with a little bit more privacy powdered onto it. Not exactly worth using anymore, and I certainly don't think they are trustworthy for quality searches if they do things like that. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17015801,3 年前I took it off on my computer and smartphone as I don't need a second Google. I don't need someone to tell me what I should look at.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17325015,3 年前Gabriel Weinberg, CEO, decide for me what I should and shouldn't be able to find when I'm searching for things.
If I wanted to be censored I would use google.
so, I'm out. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17324263,3 年前BIG TECH FAR LEFT CONTROLLED- NOT TO BE TRUSTED ANYMORE, DELETE
- You must think humans are dumb for not being able to discern from disinformation. But censoring it for a PR stunt on twitter is just ridiculous. I bet $50 only 1/100 Duck Duck Go users support this decision. It doesn't make much sense, unless you actively want to destroy your integrity and shill for twitter. This act is repulsive.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 DerLinuxminzige,3 年前I was a conviced user of DDG until I read this morning: (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/duckduckgo-updates-search-engine-will-penalize-sites-associated-disinformation)
I chose my information and not any duck - if so I could use goggle. Firefox should delete the support for DDG and offer us an other trusted alternative. I installed Qwant for now as I do not see any other trusted searchengine.
I am OUTRAGED by this trust breaking action of DDG. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Maximilian,3 年前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15979466,3 年前This project started out with so much hope. But now this CEO also thinks he knows better than all of us and can manipulate the way we think and the information we see. AVOID THIS ADD-ON.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15242125,3 年前Company is turning into Google. Only allowing you to see what they want you to see and blocking what they don't agree with.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Txn Aussie,3 年前No different than Bing, except Microsoft is collecting your data. Now that they are censoring, I will go some where else. The only benefit you get now is privacy, but with bing I can get the censorship and be paid in Microsoft points, so the search engine doesn't have a purpose, as I left big tech to avoid censorship and get privacy, I'm moving to Brave search, presearch, SearX and Yacy.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17323215,3 年前i used Duckduckgo as an alternative to google for so long, Today i heard your censoring websites and for that I will be deleting and moving to Brave.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17322617,3 年前Is there no browser that will let me make my own decisions about what is good/bad information? I don't want other people making the decision for me. This was a terrible decision on DuckDuckGo's part. The two majors sales bullet points that differentiated DuckDuckGo from Google was a) you searches would be private and b) your searches wouldn't be censored. Well that didn't hold up well did it?
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17183981,3 年前Censoring searches, you may as well use google. For everyone looking for an alternative I have heard Brave search is good. I am going to try that.