Easy Youtube Video Downloader Express 的評論
Easy Youtube Video Downloader Express 作者: Dishita
CheshireRaptor 所留下的評論
評價 2 分,滿分 5 分
來自 CheshireRaptor,5 年前After taking a look, almost all of the five star reviews are just someone hitting five stars and no actual review and I personally don't count those type of "reviews". This is NOT easy to use in PRO as you have to follow the steps CAREFULLY and read EVERYTHING. If you want to download anything above 360p (at the time of this review) you HAVE to give them money. 360p is the ONLY option you have unless you go pro. Also if you want much FASTER, cleaner, ad-free and streamlined downloading experience you have to give them money. The cheapest you can pay to get things is $10 and they claim it's a one time fee. Even with the Pro some larger videos, anything above 144.2mb (4 min and longer) take awhile to compile, so it is by no means "fast". The 2 and a half minute video (29.8 mb) went fast. And for reference, I have fiber internet. Currently downloading an 144.2mb, 175.5mb and a 583.3mb videos at the same time. You defiantly cannot do more than one video at a time. Been over 16 minutes for the three. While the small video took less than a second on Pro and this was with the 583.3mb video already started. Even after the two smaller videos finished compiling (about 30 minutes) the larger one is still going - been about sixteen minutes on it's own and it's just now at 50%. Been over 46 minutes downloading. In the end, it took an hour ON IT'S OWN to compile.
The free version of the video I downloaded (144.2mb file) obviously wasn't a grand copy but I saw no ads in it. It of course downloaded faster than the Pro version of it, but to be fair, it was the first video I downloaded and there was nothing to tell me how long it took. Had to check the folder to see that it was done. The Pro version of the same video was better looking, still no ads and for them both the sound was similar.
I completely understand that this stuff takes time and someone needs to stay on top of it, but don't lie to people and say the reasoning is that it "needs powerful server infrastructure". Because of this lie I'd suggest downloading JDownloader Plus for free and learning to use that. It's not too difficult and you can get the 1080p for free.
The free version of the video I downloaded (144.2mb file) obviously wasn't a grand copy but I saw no ads in it. It of course downloaded faster than the Pro version of it, but to be fair, it was the first video I downloaded and there was nothing to tell me how long it took. Had to check the folder to see that it was done. The Pro version of the same video was better looking, still no ads and for them both the sound was similar.
I completely understand that this stuff takes time and someone needs to stay on top of it, but don't lie to people and say the reasoning is that it "needs powerful server infrastructure". Because of this lie I'd suggest downloading JDownloader Plus for free and learning to use that. It's not too difficult and you can get the 1080p for free.
17,488 筆評論
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Final Sphinx,10 小時前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 STOP-BUGGING-ME,11 小時前It would have been four stars, except I keep being nagged to leave a fucking review after every download. Right now, it's 2. If it ends up as a one-star, it's because the message doesn't go away.
Edit: Uninstalling. Fuck you. - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Kevin Betts,1 天前Downloaded a file, loaded it onto a USB stick, and played it on my parents DVD player (which is not connected to the internet!). Not sure what the recent one star review claiming the extension merely streamed the video was on about! That certainly wasn't my experience.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18374959,1 天前Quite simply, it lies about what it's doing. Try playing one of its video files without an internet connection and it makes the issue obvious. The only thing this is doing is creating a file that will enable you to stream the video from where it is hosted. If the host moves or deletes the file? Useless. If the host modifies the file? You lose access to the older copy you thought you had.
This level of misrepresentation should be taken as active deception. - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14772510,2 天前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 19525007,2 天前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15652590,2 天前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 DerpenFragen,2 天前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Anahori Simon,3 天前