Firefox Multi-Account Containers 的評論
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 作者: Firefox
5,964 筆評論
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14344855,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17455400,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefoxero,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13824773,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17473345,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 voshchronos,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17471710,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17470288,3 年前Astoundingly handy add-on. Integrates brilliantly with Mozilla VPN such that I can select a distinct server per container type if I want
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15750198,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16865904,3 年前Key reason I use Firefox is for Multi-Account Containers and managing multiple 365 tenants.
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17466013,3 年前
- Works well in cooperation with Cloudflare WARP (proxy mode).
The extension allows for specific selected sites to bypass censorship.
Does not affect all other sites and other network connections. Which is very convenient.
use socks://localhost:port
exactly localhost, not 127.0.0.1 - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15902071,3 年前This is game changer and not the reason I stay with Firefox. However, when question of Brave comes up, with all that they do, although they are building off chromium code so maybe it is a function that cannot be implemented ( I think it can be but not sure if maybe some limitations that would make it not as effective as what Mozilla can do with having their own engine for their browser ). I am with Firefox regardless. 65% Firefox, 25% Brave, and 10% Chrome, last one to sandbox off google and microsoft from touching other browsers but all it gets are those two companies plus yahoo.
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Thierry Insparium,3 年前