Random Unusual Wikipedia new tab 的評論
Random Unusual Wikipedia new tab 作者: daiyi
16 筆評論
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15888921,4 年前I love it !!! It's both funny and instructive
If I had a critique it would only be on the fact that it loads the page from browser instead of being embedded into a new tab : what it does that's annoying is the fact that there's a link written in the search bar when I open a new tab now, and most of the time I forget to ctrl+A then delete and just search "whateverhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/heyitsannoying" into google, wich is annoying
Having a blank search bar all the time would be great - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Wetenschaap,6 年前My productivity noticeably suffers when I use this add-on. On the upside, I always have some weird trivial fact at the ready to bore someone with at a party.
Great work! - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Geoffrey De Belie,6 年前A great idea. I would like to see random pages from other language Wikipedia's as well.
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14999239,6 年前
- 評價 2 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14754397,6 年前Good idea ext. But inability to custom range wikipe topics and focus on address bar when new tab is disappointing. That is half reasons why not using.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14716302,6 年前This extension is worthy of 5 stars, but I'm not gonna use it more than the 10 minutes i sat looking at animated crosswalk lights on wikipedia, it's predatory to my productivity xD
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 García y García,7 年前Clean up cognitive biases in about 5 minutes of active pause without losing focus on your work. YAY!!
開發者回應
張貼於 7 年前interesting, I'll take a look this weekend! Tracking: https://github.com/daiyi/random-wikipedia-newtab-extension/issues/4- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13927886,7 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Jan C. Borchardt,7 年前This is great stuff! :) Would be cool if it works on Firefox mobile too
- Works exactly as described. Simple and effective. I'd like to see more options and explanations. Does the default "random unusual wikipedia page" setting include both the other two options? ("cognitive biases" and "philosophical concepts") I haven't seen any yet, but it has only been a few days. Also, what defines "unusual wikipedia page", is there a list maintained somewhere, or is it based on some dataset?
Thanks for the great add-on!!