Wayback Machine 的評論
Wayback Machine 作者: Internet Archive
359 筆評論
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 CloudUchiha,8 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 brewster kahle,8 年前Works well for me. Thank you. (I use it alot because I work with the Internet Archive)
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Kuba Niewiarowski,8 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12889199,8 年前Which is quite a bit less than it would take you to do the same on the official site. It's a winner :)
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Jonathan Cardona Rojas,8 年前It works. Not quite as fast as one could wish, but I does it's work well. Very impressive. Looking for less clicks to save a page.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13385400,8 年前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak,8 年前Please don't change the URL. Please. That's horrible UX, makes me want to disable the extension right away.
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13283124,8 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 konstischuetze,8 年前It some times shows up where it shouldn't, but much more often it saved me from tedious searches. This includes cases where a website was broken, gone or simply had a temporary downtime.
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 11913688,8 年前This WayBackMachine extension is nearly mandatory on the modern web. There are so many pages nowadays that have disappeared or changed that I find myself constantly having to look up archived copies. This extension saves me the tedium of repeatedly copying a URL, going to archive.org, then pasting it into the search box.
There are some downsides, but this is such a needed feature that I have to give it five stars.
Downside 1: this extension adds yet another button to my already cluttered toolbar. I'd much rather that it showed up in the context menu (right click) and could be bound to keyboard shortcuts.
Suggestion: Perhaps the next version could implement both interfaces, but allow either to be disabled in the preferences.
Downside 2: this only checks archive.org. While that is my preferred site, other extensions also have the ability to check cached versions from Google, Coral, and other search engines.
Downside 3a: While this extension's ability to automatically detect 404 (not found) errors is a nice feature, it doesn't seem to work everywhere (try youtube.com/thisurlreturns404).
Downside 3b: Even worse, some websites don't like returning 404, and instead return 301 (moved permanently) or 302 (redirect). For example, try ebay.com/notfound, which redirects the URL to pages.ebay.com/messages/page_not_found.html?abigbunchofgarbage and then returns 200 (success). On a site like that, if you then click WaybackMachine → Recent Version, you'll either be told "URL not found in wayback archives" or be shown an archived copy of the wrong page.
Suggestion: Perhaps a future version of this extension could make note of redirections and, when the WayBackMachine is used, the requested URLs would be tried in FIFO order (until one of them succeeds or they all fail).
Downside 4: If the lookup at archive.org fails, an error dialog will pop up with an annoying alert sound. - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12960805,8 年前Awesome to see the evolution of a brand as depicted on their site over time
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Hotstuff8224,8 年前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12919816,9 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12916690,9 年前I am often digging around obscure websites and regularly run into 404's and even websites with expired domains. This addon helps automate an essential part of my research workflow.