Bewertungen für NoScript
NoScript von Giorgio Maone
Bewertungen von Firefox-Benutzer 13553842
Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternen
von Firefox-Benutzer 13553842, vor 8 JahrenGeorgio wrote:
> Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform)
> just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript
BUT maybe it is not so much about recreating the old thing, than understanding what the problem with the new thing is. First you need to accept that the current approach is simply not intuitive. As a dev (I am one myself, so I had this problem myself) its hard to understand when that happens, because for you its as familiar as a part of your body, but it is obviously a mistery for everbody else.
Also, about your "duty": Its true what you said, but: if many people now dont use NoScript at all, because they do not get it anymore, you decreased web security by a lot.
So:
- Simpler is better. Simpler might be less safer, but if the alternative is not using it at all, it's still better. Way better.
- get rid of the slider. It looks mhm good(?), but its not recognizable as one.
- there is way to much clickable stuff, one does not get what is a button, what a link and whatnot...
- make it simpler: hide everything exept: domain name, status icon and -depending on the status- two buttons for each entry.
- clear design, dont change font size and font color at any time
- No xss-popups. In fact, never, ever use popups.
Instead:
- a simple list of domains like before, each with a status icon in front of it: your blue "S", for allowed, same with a little clock for temporarily allowd, red crossed "S" for disallowed
- depending on the current status of an entry, two buttons:
- if currently allowed: "disallow" and "temp. disallow"
- if currently disallowed: "allow" and "temp. allow"
- these buttons need to be different than the status icon. I would use red X and green hook/check, each with and without a little clock.
- dont make anything but the buttons clickable! not the text, not the status icon.
Thats it.
You can add a (clearly seperated from the other buttons, clearly different graphic) button behind each list entry to hide all the detailed settings, for the expert. Everybody else gets the simple list.
At the very buttom of the list go -clearly separated - three entries: "temp allow all" and "save permissions for this site" and "deactivate noscript".
No problem to do that in html. And believe me, people will love you again. :)
If you would like me to make a mockup of what Ive just desrcibed, just say so and tell me where to send it.
And btw.: You dont owe us anything. People have no right being rude to you about something you gave us for free. But maybe see their ill-advised passion as a testament to how important NoScript is to us. That is something I think, even if you must hate the internet right now.
I thank you for the old NoScript and that it helped increase my security. But I won't use the current one. So I would thank you again if you make it simple and easy to use again.
> Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform)
> just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript
BUT maybe it is not so much about recreating the old thing, than understanding what the problem with the new thing is. First you need to accept that the current approach is simply not intuitive. As a dev (I am one myself, so I had this problem myself) its hard to understand when that happens, because for you its as familiar as a part of your body, but it is obviously a mistery for everbody else.
Also, about your "duty": Its true what you said, but: if many people now dont use NoScript at all, because they do not get it anymore, you decreased web security by a lot.
So:
- Simpler is better. Simpler might be less safer, but if the alternative is not using it at all, it's still better. Way better.
- get rid of the slider. It looks mhm good(?), but its not recognizable as one.
- there is way to much clickable stuff, one does not get what is a button, what a link and whatnot...
- make it simpler: hide everything exept: domain name, status icon and -depending on the status- two buttons for each entry.
- clear design, dont change font size and font color at any time
- No xss-popups. In fact, never, ever use popups.
Instead:
- a simple list of domains like before, each with a status icon in front of it: your blue "S", for allowed, same with a little clock for temporarily allowd, red crossed "S" for disallowed
- depending on the current status of an entry, two buttons:
- if currently allowed: "disallow" and "temp. disallow"
- if currently disallowed: "allow" and "temp. allow"
- these buttons need to be different than the status icon. I would use red X and green hook/check, each with and without a little clock.
- dont make anything but the buttons clickable! not the text, not the status icon.
Thats it.
You can add a (clearly seperated from the other buttons, clearly different graphic) button behind each list entry to hide all the detailed settings, for the expert. Everybody else gets the simple list.
At the very buttom of the list go -clearly separated - three entries: "temp allow all" and "save permissions for this site" and "deactivate noscript".
No problem to do that in html. And believe me, people will love you again. :)
If you would like me to make a mockup of what Ive just desrcibed, just say so and tell me where to send it.
And btw.: You dont owe us anything. People have no right being rude to you about something you gave us for free. But maybe see their ill-advised passion as a testament to how important NoScript is to us. That is something I think, even if you must hate the internet right now.
I thank you for the old NoScript and that it helped increase my security. But I won't use the current one. So I would thank you again if you make it simple and easy to use again.
2.465 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19945682, vor einem Tag
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Diosa, vor 12 TagenMe encanta, me siento protegida con esta extensión.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Екатерина, vor 13 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18256241, vor 15 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19917843, vor 17 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18378924, vor 19 TagenMarktplaats is not working with this extension.
Had to disable the extension because it prevented me to watch pictures on pages. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon liberty, vor 19 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon FFuser68.11, vor 24 TagenUpdate: rotating the screen from portrait to landscape displays the complete noscript "page".... since latest update (Apr 23, 2026), noscript is unusable with firefox for android version 150.0.1 (android 10 on my s9+ and android 14 on my pixel 4a) [in portrait vs landscape]... when extension is displayed to view script permissions, "page" is not fully displayed [in portrait vs landscape], cannot view site information, the text on the right of displayed "page" is cutoff.... page seems zoomed in, "enlarged" and does not "shrink" so the entire "page" can be viewed, the text is cut off from view, cannot "scroll" to left or right nor pinch zoom, in or out, to view all noscript permissions and site information in portrait view, displays full "page" in landscape view... in portrait view, the noscript "page" appears as a pop-up window??? ...for an unknown reason I am unable to register on the noscript.net InformAction forum... no matter the email address used nor its length, the number of characters... Error: "The solution you provided was incorrect - Please note that you will need to enter a valid email address before your account is activated".... cannot post new topics in this forum.... Error: "The solution you provided was incorrect".
Forum permissions (displayed on the forum web page).....
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19904250, vor 25 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19902880, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19898777, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon coyo, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19893903, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Parasite, vor einem MonatEssa extensão ela é muito boa e me protegeu de vários malwares por aí, do mesmo jeito que ela bloqueie jogos antigos ela ainda é boa contra malwates
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19885048, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19882925, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon ilovefanservice, vor einem Monata must have addon for todays bad actors and annoyances
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Shanrya, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19806246, vor 2 MonatenThis is one of the most distinctive Firefox add-ons for me. To be honest, I'm not using it right now because I'm still learning how to use it more effectively. I'm actually trying to learn more about internet security, and I've noticed that using this add-on is great for protecting your privacy from malicious JavaScript. I highly recommend it. Thank you.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Heather, vor 2 MonatenProbably one of the most essential addons for firefox, next to ublock. Great for security but it's recommended to have a tech background cuz the default settings can break many sites.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Rifat, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon noewaeda, vor 3 Monatenit's an essential extension. without it, using the internet is like walking directly into a warzone.
on the strict setting, it makes browsing slightly more clunky due to having to give websites some trust, but it's usually not that big of a deal. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Max Rower, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon fidius, vor 3 MonatenI uninstalled this extension because it randomly started interfering with browsing due to some nonsense swipe-style gesture 'feature'. Used to be a good extension but I'm not inclined to trust it anymore.