Bewertungen für Selection Context Search
Selection Context Search von ContainersOnTheGo
Bewertungen von Firefox-Benutzer 13250199
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
von Firefox-Benutzer 13250199, vor 9 JahrenVery good addon, thanks.
Can you add those features below?
[1] Add a context menu "Add to Selection Context Search" when we right-click inside a search form.
[2] Improve the management of the search engine list. Now, if we have a lot of search engines and need to change the row position of one search engine far below on the list, we need scroll all the way down, select the search engine, then scroll all the way up, then click "move up" to change the row position. With few search engines, that is ok, but with a huge amount, that is not good.
# Answer 01 - 2017.09.03
An example? Right here, on AMO. With the "Selection Search" [1] extension for Google Chrome, if I Ctrl+Alt+Click the search form a popup appears [2].
I like the drag-and-drop method [3] used by the "Selection Search" extension, it really is very easy to manage this way.
My list right now has 32 search engines, the less used ones are hidden inside folders.
[1] https://github.com/Pitmairen/selection-search
[2] https://s6.postimg.org/4gbcl3hqp/image.png
[3] https://s6.postimg.org/v03xn8ia9/image.png
Can you add those features below?
[1] Add a context menu "Add to Selection Context Search" when we right-click inside a search form.
[2] Improve the management of the search engine list. Now, if we have a lot of search engines and need to change the row position of one search engine far below on the list, we need scroll all the way down, select the search engine, then scroll all the way up, then click "move up" to change the row position. With few search engines, that is ok, but with a huge amount, that is not good.
# Answer 01 - 2017.09.03
An example? Right here, on AMO. With the "Selection Search" [1] extension for Google Chrome, if I Ctrl+Alt+Click the search form a popup appears [2].
I like the drag-and-drop method [3] used by the "Selection Search" extension, it really is very easy to manage this way.
My list right now has 32 search engines, the less used ones are hidden inside folders.
[1] https://github.com/Pitmairen/selection-search
[2] https://s6.postimg.org/4gbcl3hqp/image.png
[3] https://s6.postimg.org/v03xn8ia9/image.png
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 9 JahrenUpdate: [1] and [2] are implemented in the new version which is in the review queue.
[1] Can you give me an example? A web page which you would like to add it using the context menu.
Most form requests are dynamically built by scripts and also are sent as a POST request. This means that it is quite complex to automatically extract the search URL.
A solution will be to add the website from the results page, not from the request (form) page. I can add the page title and URL automatically to the table but they will need to be manually edited. Is this fine for you?
[2] Can you please suggest how to improve the list management? Maybe implementing drag-and-drop for the table rows?
You made me curious. What is the maximum number of rows some people will actually need? I thought that my 15 rows list is big :)
[1] Can you give me an example? A web page which you would like to add it using the context menu.
Most form requests are dynamically built by scripts and also are sent as a POST request. This means that it is quite complex to automatically extract the search URL.
A solution will be to add the website from the results page, not from the request (form) page. I can add the page title and URL automatically to the table but they will need to be manually edited. Is this fine for you?
[2] Can you please suggest how to improve the list management? Maybe implementing drag-and-drop for the table rows?
You made me curious. What is the maximum number of rows some people will actually need? I thought that my 15 rows list is big :)
166 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon H3S4, vor einem MonatSehr hilfreich, schnell, spart Zeit / very helpful, fast, saves time
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13450363, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13156333, vor 7 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon woam, vor 7 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Eleuth, vor 10 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon ok, vor einem JahrI was glad to find a replacement for another one, but I can’t make it work with some links… Don’t what I’m doing wrong. Also did not find how to manage the window.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Lisa, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13723926, vor 2 JahrenIncredibly useful light addon, but it just stopped working on FF129. Is there any support site?
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon gjon, vor 2 JahrenA great and very helpful add-on, but it doesn't work since FF version 128.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Alex Mirnov, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon greenbox6, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18328500, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon algi, vor 2 JahrenStill 5⭐,but a question as well: Why it stays on only few seconds and when cursor is moved the pop-up shuts off?
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12680106, vor 3 JahrenNice and useful addon. Unfortunately, Google reverse image search doesn't work.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon bs, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Painless, vor 4 JahrenHas to be one of the most useful extensions for Firefox but it importing and adding new entries keep resetting.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12935111, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13974823, vor 4 Jahren手軽に検索出来ます
しかも何で調べるのか指定も設定(検索欄を右クリック)も可能。凄い
カカクコムは文字化けするようなので
http://prx.dip.jp/test/jump_ce.htm#utf8;sjis;https://kakaku.com/search_results/?query=
と言う感じにすると良いそうです - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon kelendral, vor 4 JahrenThis was/is one of the better search addons.
So you might ask why the low review:
1). It was delisted from Google for Privacy Violations. Thus clearly there are Privacy concerns.
2). The code is obfuscated. - Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon rediffusion, vor 4 JahrenНет возможно выборочного поиска на нескольких сайтах одновременно. Нет папок и подпапок.
Фигня! 😒 - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12799010, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon kkjiang, vor 4 JahrenThe Favicon of each search engine is not "cached" to disk drive, they must to be re-downloaded after every firefox restart, it will be better if these favicons been cached.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17316140, vor 4 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 15978319, vor 4 Jahren