Um diese Add-ons zu verwenden, müssen Sie Firefox herunterladen.

Anmelden
Add-on-Symbol

Bewertungen für Sessionaire

Sessionaire von Sessionaire

2,8 von 5 Sternen
5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
2
2 Bewertungen
  • von VascoPJ77, vor einem Monat
    Installed today, Windows 10 64 Bit, Firefox, saved session, failed to restore multiple attempts, personally would not install, will uninstall and never use again. If software does not do what it promises it should be removed from the add ons...

    I started using it after a Mozilla Firefox update wiped out Tab Session Manager, although TSM is a better option, as Mozilla trashed it, Sessionaire was a viable option, however could live without Sessionaire using 100% of CPU, 7 GB of memory, slowing down page loading to dial up speeds, and the fact that every new tab you open you have to wait 5 minutes for a Sessionaire aspect to start running before you can enter in an address or start processing it. Thus my overall assessment of Sessionaire is Meh, uninstall, try something else.
  • von EvgeniX, vor 2 Monaten
    seems shady. github page with 0 stars that contains only a readme file. in release, there's 'source code' file with again only the readme and nothing else. the first and the only version published is v1.4.6 which seems to pretend to be in the middle of lifecycle. a web site which seems too polished and entirely made by AI. wouldn't trust this one with my data.

    Antwort des Entwicklers

    geschrieben am vor 2 Monaten
    Totally fair to be cautious — but a few corrections:

    1) A Firefox extension doesn’t need to expose its full source tree on GitHub to be legitimate. The reviewed and signed code is what matters, and that lives in the AMO package, not the README repo.

    2) Version numbers aren’t lifecycle indicators — starting at 1.4.6 isn’t “pretending,” it’s just a choice.

    3) “Polished site = AI = shady” is a leap. Clean design and decent copy aren’t evidence of malicious intent.

    If you don’t trust it, that’s fine — but calling it shady without pointing to actual data access, permissions abuse, or telemetry is speculation, not analysis. If you do find something concrete, posting it would genuinely help everyone here.

    Healthy skepticism is useful. Drive-by accusations, less so.