Pógódnośenja za AdNauseam
AdNauseam wót Daniel Howe
Pógódnośenja wót TT
Z 4 z 5 pógódnośony
wót TT, 2 tahun yang lepasIt's honestly a 4-star addon, but I'm temporarily setting this to one star to get the dev's attention. Read on, and you'll see why:
It works great (for now,)and I realize it's Recommended by Mozilla, but I wanted to warn people about Google's increasingly weird TOS, and specifically, this addon's seemingly dangerous interactions with it.
When you allow this addon to run in the background, it clicks on "all ads" or "some ads," which for some reason causes Google to flag your account as "may be under 18." (Maybe it auto-clicked on a Polly Pocket ad? I dunno.)
The ambiguous wording here is, I suppose, by design. They're not accusing you of BEING underage, they're just saying maybe you are, maybe you aren't.
Of course, the only way to find out your account has been flagged in this way is to click the [+] button in the corner of an ad that Google knows darned well has nothing to do with your Recommended videos. Which means the only way you'll even become aware of it this phenomenon in the first place is by running Ad Nauseam, then turning it off again.
(Intriguingly, if you had Safe-Search turned off before you installed the plugin, becoming "maybe under 18" disables the Safe Mode button in a way that literally makes it impossible for you to enable it again. Is Google seriously trying to say that they both think you may be under 18, *and* that they're deliberately going to force you to see NSFW search results???)
The fact that the [+] only shows on ads that are drastically different from your Recommendeds shows that Google already knows exactly what it is doing, here. They're serving incongruous ads on purpose. The question is why?
It's unknown what Google's goals or long-term plan are, but combined with various other clauses in Google's TOS, this "may be under 18" phrase has some unfortunate implications:
The worst-case scenario I can imagine is, Google bans you, (that is, the user, the person, not the account,) from all of their platforms simultaneously, and also flags you in a database as some sort of child molester, ostensibly because you were over 18 when they served you your search results, but under 18 when you viewed them, and by clicking on the search results, you, an adult, were distributing NSFW content to yourself, a minor. And WEI rollout means they *might* have just enough information to track you as you move from account to account, so they could make it stick.
I doubt they'd have a legitimate legal case against anyone, since you literally can't be two ages at once. But if the goal is just to separate the internet into technological haves and have-nots, this is one excuse they could use to make sure anyone running AdNauseam ends up as a have-not, all the while telling regulators that the metrics say they banned a bunch of pedros.
That's just one of the baffling interpretations of the faux-legalease in these TOS that treats each user as a quantum superposition of their browsing behavior, rather than as a person.
(That said, they can also ban any user they want for "not being profitable enough." They added that gem in 2019. Which you'd think would be good enough to let them do away with all accounts that use ad-blockers, across the board, so I'm not sure what the goal of this stealth ad semi-shadowban is.)
I'd say "stay safe out there," but with the FBI demanding that literally everybody run an ad blocker, I'm not even sure I know what "safe" means anymore.
Not a complaint, just an observation. I would add one star if this situation could somehow be addressed by the addon. (But of course, it can't. That's the point.)
I'll set it back to 4 stars if the dev responds. He seems to take one-star reviews very seriously if past behavior is any indication. (Sorry for the inconvenience, Daniel. For what it's worth, I really like the use of negative space on your website.)
Also, apparently, for the guy above me, KOLJAAAA, it auto-clicked on Malware. Yikes! I wonder if Google is also doing THAT on purpose.
It works great (for now,)and I realize it's Recommended by Mozilla, but I wanted to warn people about Google's increasingly weird TOS, and specifically, this addon's seemingly dangerous interactions with it.
When you allow this addon to run in the background, it clicks on "all ads" or "some ads," which for some reason causes Google to flag your account as "may be under 18." (Maybe it auto-clicked on a Polly Pocket ad? I dunno.)
The ambiguous wording here is, I suppose, by design. They're not accusing you of BEING underage, they're just saying maybe you are, maybe you aren't.
Of course, the only way to find out your account has been flagged in this way is to click the [+] button in the corner of an ad that Google knows darned well has nothing to do with your Recommended videos. Which means the only way you'll even become aware of it this phenomenon in the first place is by running Ad Nauseam, then turning it off again.
(Intriguingly, if you had Safe-Search turned off before you installed the plugin, becoming "maybe under 18" disables the Safe Mode button in a way that literally makes it impossible for you to enable it again. Is Google seriously trying to say that they both think you may be under 18, *and* that they're deliberately going to force you to see NSFW search results???)
The fact that the [+] only shows on ads that are drastically different from your Recommendeds shows that Google already knows exactly what it is doing, here. They're serving incongruous ads on purpose. The question is why?
It's unknown what Google's goals or long-term plan are, but combined with various other clauses in Google's TOS, this "may be under 18" phrase has some unfortunate implications:
The worst-case scenario I can imagine is, Google bans you, (that is, the user, the person, not the account,) from all of their platforms simultaneously, and also flags you in a database as some sort of child molester, ostensibly because you were over 18 when they served you your search results, but under 18 when you viewed them, and by clicking on the search results, you, an adult, were distributing NSFW content to yourself, a minor. And WEI rollout means they *might* have just enough information to track you as you move from account to account, so they could make it stick.
I doubt they'd have a legitimate legal case against anyone, since you literally can't be two ages at once. But if the goal is just to separate the internet into technological haves and have-nots, this is one excuse they could use to make sure anyone running AdNauseam ends up as a have-not, all the while telling regulators that the metrics say they banned a bunch of pedros.
That's just one of the baffling interpretations of the faux-legalease in these TOS that treats each user as a quantum superposition of their browsing behavior, rather than as a person.
(That said, they can also ban any user they want for "not being profitable enough." They added that gem in 2019. Which you'd think would be good enough to let them do away with all accounts that use ad-blockers, across the board, so I'm not sure what the goal of this stealth ad semi-shadowban is.)
I'd say "stay safe out there," but with the FBI demanding that literally everybody run an ad blocker, I'm not even sure I know what "safe" means anymore.
Not a complaint, just an observation. I would add one star if this situation could somehow be addressed by the addon. (But of course, it can't. That's the point.)
I'll set it back to 4 stars if the dev responds. He seems to take one-star reviews very seriously if past behavior is any indication. (Sorry for the inconvenience, Daniel. For what it's worth, I really like the use of negative space on your website.)
Also, apparently, for the guy above me, KOLJAAAA, it auto-clicked on Malware. Yikes! I wonder if Google is also doing THAT on purpose.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał 2 tahun yang lepasHey TT, thank you for your extensive review, we had never come accross such an issue before, could you share with us some more info regarding it on the issue ticket I just created on our github page: https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/issues/2439
We are discussing some possible implementation that can help deal with such unwanted ad visits here as well, feel free to share your opinion: https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/issues/2440
We are discussing some possible implementation that can help deal with such unwanted ad visits here as well, feel free to share your opinion: https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/issues/2440
591 pógódnośenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Viviana, 10 hari yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18939966, 13 hari yang lepas
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 16912776, 22 hari yang lepaswas working fine until recently, now every time i reopen firefox it pops up the setup page and resets the settings. going back to regular uBlock
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót akiva, sebulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Nikitamce, 2 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Jonathan, 2 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18852758, 2 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Bullfinch, 3 bulan yang lepas
- Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13248877, 3 bulan yang lepasUnfortunately this addon is causing constant errors on YouTube at the moment. Causing playback errors about 90% of the time when clicking a video into a new tab. Had to disable for now.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał 2 bulan yang lepasThe issue is now fixed, thank you for the feedback - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Arnald, 3 bulan yang lepasLove how AdNauseam works. However it would be nice to have the ad vault limit how many ads it saves. Or have it auto delete the vault after a certain amount of time.(Like after 30 days or a week depending on a persons preference)
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18803201, 3 bulan yang lepasEvery time I think about having this app, I laugh with joy
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót emacsomancer, 3 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Jonas, 4 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót spiralthinker, 4 bulan yang lepasstrongest adblocker I`ve found today removes any ads even on e-mail interface
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Sloccy, 4 bulan yang lepasWhile the original purpose of this extension is to obfuscate your advertising profile, I use it with the hope that it generates more revenue towards some of my favorite sites! I dial the click frequency back to the minimum of 10% in the hope that the click fraud wont be detected and those sites make more money from me than otherwise. I can't afford to subscribe or donate to every site, but I can afford to do this. All while not having to pollute my view with the ads to begin with. Thanks for making this and keep up the great work!
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18767442, 4 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Zorolin, 4 bulan yang lepas
- Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót topzspin, 4 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Сырное, 5 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Oddbrother, 5 bulan yang lepasMorally, it serves its intended purpose. When doing your normal routine on the Internet, it does its job well to keep you untracked. And when private browsing, it really steps up its game to be sure you're under the radar.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Carlos Renck, 5 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17659878, 6 bulan yang lepas
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Sergey Yaskov, 6 bulan yang lepas