Pógódnośenja za FoxFilter
FoxFilter wót Inspired Effect
80 pógódnośenjow
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Psychpsyo, neljä päivää sittenHello, I'm currently testing parental control systems to see which adult content tagging systems they respect. Even with "Examine Meta Content" turned on in the sensitivity settings, this extension fails to block websites based on various meta tags used by adult websites to identify themselves as such.
I've tested the following meta tags in use by adult websites and none of them cause the page to be blocked:
<meta name="rating" content="adult" />
<meta name="rating" content="mature" />
<meta name="RATING" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
<meta name="rating" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
This let me access at least two websites and various twitter accounts with explicit pornographic content which would otherwise have been blocked.
Also, all adult sites I've checked so far include at least one of these tags. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Kuriakose, 14 päivää sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót HDDHSER, kuukausi sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Matija, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18974369, neljä kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18940725, neljä kuukautta sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Сырное, viisi kuukautta sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Al, kuusi kuukautta sittenDon't waste your time, the password protection feature is behind a paywall.
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót akasico1, kuusi kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18639388, 10 kuukautta sitten
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Radu, vuosi sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Tushar Sharma, vuosi sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18512180, vuosi sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18410251, vuosi sittenA bloquer l'accès à des sites pour faire les devoirs de mes enfants. Demande de payer pour débloquer le site. Extension à fuir.
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót Yoann Moreau, vuosi sittenNot so smart.
- When opening links in a tab, the filter will block the current page instead of the new tab.
- Filtering is quite basic and will have many false positive and false negative.
- Access to extension settings is protected with a ugly workaround, not convenient at all, and not secured anyway. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót davegod75, kaksi vuotta sittenHas been working well for me. You do have to pay for it, but it is well worth it. It is quite simple to use and exactly what I was looking for for the kids computers. Simple to install and manage from one place.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 16976370, kaksi vuotta sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót McZ, kaksi vuotta sittenPassword protects only the browser settings. It can easily be deactivated or removed from the puzzle icon - even with a password in place
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Zorele, kaksi vuotta sitten
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Rakib, kolme vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17517208, kolme vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17490130, kolme vuotta sitten
- Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót jokenngo, kolme vuotta sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Mephistopheles, kolme vuotta sittenWorks, but uses the shady practice of not being able to set a password unless you pay them, so even if it's there, anybody can just turn it off anyway
Edit: Even if you pay them, trying to install the android version says not intended for android,wtf??Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał kolme vuotta sittenHi, we offer all of the filtering options free of charge as a way to try out FoxFilter. In order help cover our expenses, we do charge a very minimal annual fee of $12.99, which we feel is very affordable. We are equally frustrated about Google Android only selectively supporting approximately 200 Chrome extensions for some reason, even though all Chrome extensions were installable on Android at one point. Feel free to reach out to us at foxfilter@inspiredeffect.com to discuss this more. Best regards, FoxFilter Team