Pógódnośenja za SingleFile
SingleFile wót gildas
1.004 pógódnośenja
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 15760230, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13048311, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Radu Bogoevici, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Cormchij, 6 jaar geledenTried a lot of extensions. Your best. But it cuts the length of the file name by 140 characters. This is inconvenient. Can I remove this restriction?
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał 6 jaar geledenThank you. You can update the hidden option "filenameMaxLength" for that. See https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/wiki/Hidden-options for more info about how to change hidden options. Feel free to contact me if you need help. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót dinor studio, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót NocedaCloud, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Marce, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wo, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót fuzzydorito, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót JavirtanLabs, 6 jaar geledenI used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał 6 jaar geledenThank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13870051, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót triantafillia, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót 茶几上的猫, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Cherwally, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Arioh, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 14738141, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Idan Nabara, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót i18n, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Marieli, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Abe, 6 jaar geledenMake sure to enable this for JavaScript (https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq.md#why-dont-interactive-elements-like-folding-titles-dynamic-maps-or-carousels-work-properly-in-saved-pages).
Works great! However, I really feel like saving scripts, audio elements, etc. should be enabled by default.Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał 6 jaar geledenThank you for the review. The default settings are optimized to produce light (and faithful) snapshot of pages because this was the most recurrent complain in the past. That's why the options you mentioned are disabled. Note also that disabling the option "remove scripts" can, unfortunately, lead to corrupted pages.