Pógódnośenja za Smart Referer
Smart Referer wót meh., ntninja
75 pógódnośenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Krisna S. Putra, ੧੦ ਮਹੀਨੇ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Lucas S., ੨ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 14234915, ੨ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇPlease update the whitelist
https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-optional - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Bryan Hoang, ੩ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót kcufuoyeid, ੩ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇIt works for me, for the most part. I saw my firewall logs and somebody else mentioned some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
It's crazy to have such checking for updates every startup at 24 hour internals with no way to change this is a bit excessive. I disabled whitelist. downloaded the whitelist , modified it to my own liking and stored it as a local file. This add-on would be vastly improved it had a easier to use and more intuitive interface for managing websites if they break. Last update was 3 years ago so I guess that's it for this add-on. - Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót rocksoccer, ੩ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇIt kind of does its job, but as many other reviews mentioned, whitelist is really such a bad idea for most people and most usage scenarios.
I only want to modify the referers for a particular website and that's all. Blacklist will be much better. I know it is not as so-called safe as whitelist, but it will become suitable for much more people. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Artyom, ੪ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót tama, ੪ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇThanks for great addon!
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wojox, ੪ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót odysseus, ੪ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Novakof, ੫ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót まさきん, ੫ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 16037335, ੫ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Mofiac, ੫ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13541847, ੫ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 14392904, ੫ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇIs it really required to use dweb infrastructure to get a tiny whitelist file? My FF shooting a bunch of requests to some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
I thought I've got a malware when I saw that in my log files.
And it takes half an hour to figure out the source of suspicious web traffic. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Anton, ੫ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Сырное, ੬ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 15254132, ੬ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót _ztv, ੬ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇРасширение давно не работает, хватит звездочки ему ставить. Да и белый список давно не обновлялся.
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13386478, ੬ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇDoesn't seem to work. Simple settings in the FF's about:config work, however.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13864526, ੬ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót GammaGate, ੬ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 12338472, ੬ ਸਾਲ ਪਿਛਲੇ