Aby toś te dodanki wužywał, musyśo Firefox ześěgnuś.

Pśizjawiś
Dodankowy symbol

Pógódnośenja za Synology Image Assistant Extension

Synology Image Assistant Extension wót Synology Inc.

1,3 z 5 gwězdkow
5
0
4
2
3
0
2
1
1
23
Pógódnośenja wót natxocc
wót natxocc, 10 mesi fa
Soy usuario de 6 equipos Synology. Ahora mis equipos han perdido el valor ya que las fotografías, uno de mis principales motivos, no sirven para nada con esta tontería que han hecho. Wallapop para ir vendiendo mis Synology's y por suerte en el mercado ahora exiten opciones muy interesantes para sustituirlo, menor precio, mayor libertad y muy completas.
26 pógódnośenjow
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19647218, 24 giorni fa
  • wót yx, 3 mesi fa
    It is a bad idea to let clients do works server supposed to do, the performance is very bad, Synology NAS is getting harder to use than before
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17126796, 5 mesi fa
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19191558, 6 mesi fa
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13848580, 7 mesi fa
    I assume that this feature should be added to the server and not to the browser. This extension should not have access to all websites. After using it for a few months, I rarely use the upload feature for these file formats. I prefer to uninstall it, as the pros and cons are too negative.
  • wót Matthew Wade, 8 mesi fa
    Common image formats like HEIC should be supported natively in Synology Photos. This is pushing me towards Open Source alternatives
  • wót Михаил, 9 mesi fa
    it eats up all 16 gb of RAM and crashes after five minutes
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 15409872, un anno fa
    C'mon, Synology! Add the codecs back. This is ridiculous.
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18833945, un anno fa
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18816826, un anno fa
    Fucked my current transferts up
  • wót wnagrodzki, un anno fa
  • wót John, un anno fa
    Really disappointed by Synology!
  • wót wolfangaukang, un anno fa
    So cool they decided to do this to us and not even give support to Linux users for the desktop app. Seriously considering another option after this.
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 14836411, un anno fa
  • wót SireMarcus, un anno fa
  • wót th2000125, un anno fa
    Synology must reverse this decision.
  • wót paradeiser, un anno fa
    Thats a deal-breaker. Ripping vital functions from DSM and forcing end-users (not just admins) to install extra software (Browser plug-in PLUS desktop software!) is a real breach of trust!
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18701088, un anno fa
    Eine Frechheit, was sich Synology mit dem Update auf 7.2.2 geleistet hat. Funktionen auf dem Server wegnehmen und dann nur halbherzig auf die Clients verlagen. Linux User bleiben jedenfalls hier außen vor
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 14053296, un anno fa
    They decided to make the user experience worse. If I want to share HEIC files with others through Synology Photos I have to make them go trhough stupid hoops to install things they don't want. This has singlehandledly made me decide to move away from Synology for my next NAS.
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 16005419, un anno fa
    Synolgoy has removed basic functionality with this decison and made their NAS non-competitive with other brands. When it's time for a new NAS, I won't be procuring Synology. Makes you wonder who is making decisions like this. Really unfortunate.
  • wót SteffoSpieler, un anno fa
    Has access to every page, and adds a div with the id "synofoto-browser-extension-loaded" to them. I know, a Synology NAS can be at any domain, but at least make it so the end-user can enter the domain names into the settings. Doing it this way is not great.
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 14622355, un anno fa
    From what I can tell its working as advertised. Just not happy with synology decision. Also this should be more accessible, like a prompt within photos linking users to this extension. There is zero reason to haft to go searching for it. Would be 5 stars but like I said, very ticked offf with synology.
  • wót Kramberg, un anno fa
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 14296879, un anno fa