Pógódnośenja za 'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video)
'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video) wót code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
798 pógódnośenjow
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19438257, kuukausi sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Yevhen Tretiakov, kuukausi sitten
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót stapuft, kaksi kuukautta sittenWorks allright, but on mobile, you have tonswitch to "desktop mode" to make some features work, like automatically redirecting from the shitty "shorts" page to the actual YouTube page for the video.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał kuukausi sittenHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will. This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais "... (+preparing mobile m.youtube)". (Please give fair feedback. We could flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep information visible.) - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót PP, kaksi kuukautta sittenSeems to work for me. Haven't come across any issues for my uses
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Lakyn, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót MetalGear89, kaksi kuukautta sittenFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19465923, kaksi kuukautta sittenThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał kuukausi sittenhi! youtube changing is not an issue we share every day. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18989911, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót ueeu, kaksi kuukautta sittenVery good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UI
Edit: CPU usage wise I think so, but it seems to also interfere with page loading, most of the time for me it's a blank pageWótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał kuukausi sitten1. You mean a full page youtune replacement UI? 2. There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox.
EDIT: Blank page? why and how? Did you check the browser console before? If it is related to one of our features the will you use our github bug report form please? (I shouldn't type this 1000s of times and Firefox feedback is not meant to be bad for bug reports. It will be remove then.) - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Vangxim, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót SzymonL, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17491097, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Cboom, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Ivia Relle, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Hoàng Hải Hậu, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 4 z 5 pógódnośonywót kodia, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót coldcoffee, kolme kuukautta sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót DOT, kolme kuukautta sitten
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19242234, kolme kuukautta sittenThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał kaksi kuukautta sittenHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We could also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own). - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót kindtoanimals, kolme kuukautta sitten