With all due respect, this review is cheeky. Of course, the extension is just a tool and you should always check what you delete. Common sense tells you that. In the end, the reliability of the result depends above all on the website's servers and the stability of your own Internet connection. The fact is that not every website allows you to query its availability automatically, and not every internet connection can cope with a large number of simultaneous requests. However, you have this problem with every extension of this type without exception. In fact, the Bookmarks Organizer is so smart that it handles this better than many comparable extensions. And finally, for cases that cannot be checked, there is firstly a whitelist, and secondly, problems with certain bookmarks can be reported at any time so that I can put them on an internal list and they no longer provide false results for anyone - which you have not done. Instead, you just throw out the worst rating, even though the extension does exactly what it can do. And, by the way, experience has shown that the vast majority of users don't get that much false results. But, as I said, it depends on external factors, and it simply cannot be completely avoided.

Also, "websites that are now HTTPS instead of HTTP" will never be treated as errors by the Bookmarks Organizer, that's just not true. Calling this extension "useless" without providing any meaningful feedback for the developer is a really bad behavior.

That's sad.