Revisiones de Tridactyl
Tridactyl por Colin Caine, Oliver Blanthorn
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 14048265
Se valoró con 4 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 14048265, hace 8 añosI've been a long time pentadactyl user and like other reviewers here have been evaluating a few alternatives to replace it . So far it seems like tridactyl is the only current one that approaches and has the best potential in trying to provide a pentadactyl/vimperator experience.
Being used to the maturity of pentadactyl, using tridactyl does leave me feeling a bit disabled
- tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
- mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work.
- things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
- tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
- searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
- some keybindings are different from pentadactyl - e.g. `yy` as opposed to `y` to yank the url - arguably tridactyl is doing the right thing but it does mean some investment in unlearning/remapping things.
- a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
tridactyl is still young but has an active community/code-base and I'm sure most of my pains will go away in time. So far it looks like this is the contender I will stick with.
Being used to the maturity of pentadactyl, using tridactyl does leave me feeling a bit disabled
- tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
- mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work.
- things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
- tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
- searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
- some keybindings are different from pentadactyl - e.g. `yy` as opposed to `y` to yank the url - arguably tridactyl is doing the right thing but it does mean some investment in unlearning/remapping things.
- a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
tridactyl is still young but has an active community/code-base and I'm sure most of my pains will go away in time. So far it looks like this is the contender I will stick with.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 8 añosHi, thanks for such a detailed review.
> mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work
I've just added documentation in the betas to explain this better: you need to first set some homepages via `set home url1 url2 url3`. We don't get access to the Firefox ones.
> things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
At least some of that is our fault, and we're looking into it, albeit slowly :)
> tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
That's usually because focus has gone into an iframe, which are pretty fenced off. There's not much we can do about it :(
> tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
> searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
> a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
These are all in progress. `js` is in the beta branch but is a bit janky.
If you need any help, don't hesitate to come into the Matrix channel or IRC advertised on the new tab page and the help page.
> mapping like 'gh/GH' appear to be documented but do not seem to work
I've just added documentation in the betas to explain this better: you need to first set some homepages via `set home url1 url2 url3`. We don't get access to the Firefox ones.
> things feel slower, e.g. my muscle memory from pentadactyl has a T + Enter to open a newtab but in tridactyl opening the commandline takes about half a second - making a few things no-ops and I have to attempt again albeit slower. :)
At least some of that is our fault, and we're looking into it, albeit slowly :)
> tridactyl sometimes stop working on some pages and I have to switch tabs and back to get it working again
That's usually because focus has gone into an iframe, which are pretty fenced off. There's not much we can do about it :(
> tab-completion at the command line is missing. I hope this gets added.
> searching still uses the firefox native search interface (i.e. `ctrl-f`) but a feature to support this appears to be under development.
> a lot of my custom plugins for pentdactyl don't work but as javascript support improves, things could be ported over but the docs/examples on this front are few and far between.
These are all in progress. `js` is in the beta branch but is a bit janky.
If you need any help, don't hesitate to come into the Matrix channel or IRC advertised on the new tab page and the help page.
514 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17112212, hace 18 horasfantastique. tridactyl is the most thought out and perfected exploration of what is imo an important branch of browsers as technology.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por user-1231241251266543315263456789654321, hace 4 díasmakes the web so much more enjoyable!
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por TypicalUser128, hace 17 díasIt works on more sites than Vimium. It's faster than Vimium. Tridactyl is simply better than Vimium. Only Qutebrowser is more effective than this. Wow.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Davide, hace 18 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por v69777, hace un mesI tried several keyboard-oriented browsers, but for now nothing beats Firefox with Tridactyl installed.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18524146, hace 2 mesesI have tried Vimium, Vimium C, Surfing Keys, and a few others; however, Tridactyl is the best. It is comparable in terms of raw power and capability to Qutebrowser, which is remarkable. I have yet to find a use case where a Qutebrowser solution did not also work in Tridactyl. My favorite features include the `:command` mode to execute complex commands (including chaining them), the ability to use custom JavaScript, the tridactylrc file (makes it easy to sync dotfiles), the ability to control other add-ons, and the ability to control Firefox itself (i.e., clear history, local storage, etc: by time or whatever). It is without a doubt the most feature-rich Vim-like browser add-on; as a result, it also loads the slowest. It also currently has issues with Google Docs/Sheets/Drive, so you may need to use an alternative (like Vimium) for those sites. Lastly, this add-on also requires the most learning and configuration to use efficiently, as it is the most complex. In conclusion, if you are a power user who strives to abandon the mouse entirely with full control over the browser, then Tridactyl is the add-on for you. But if you just want something simple, then Vimium or Surfing Keys are always an option too.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Pawel, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Vovix, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por happsen, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Helkin, hace 5 mesesGreat user experience.
I just remove default Ctrl-f bind since it is burned into my muscle memory that it’s this to find on a web browser. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Flat, dark and simple, hace 5 mesesAmazing extension, only lacking on the theme documentation
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por aaronedev, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por rev0kable, hace 6 mesesThis Vim modeled addon has the most features for a power user, it have more of a learning curve than say, Vimium if you want to utilize the additional capabilities.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19545892, hace 6 mesesBrowsing gets faster with this extension however it doesn't enhance firefox to be as good as qutebrowser
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15962029, hace 6 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por mi6, hace 6 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19438303, hace 7 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17908336, hace 7 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Rockey, hace 7 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19201857, hace 8 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por uimk, hace 8 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Conor, hace 8 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por rebelyell, hace 8 meses