Arviot lisäosalle NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite tekijä Giorgio Maone
Käyttäjän robsku kirjoittama arvio
Arvioitu 5/5
kirjoittanut robsku, kuusi vuotta sittenI'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2 453 arviota
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19893903, 19 tuntia sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Parasite, päivä sittenEssa extensão ela é muito boa e me protegeu de vários malwares por aí, do mesmo jeito que ela bloqueie jogos antigos ela ainda é boa contra malwates
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19885048, kuusi päivää sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19882925, seitsemän päivää sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut ilovefanservice, 13 päivää sittena must have addon for todays bad actors and annoyances
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Shanrya, 15 päivää sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19806246, 22 päivää sittenThis is one of the most distinctive Firefox add-ons for me. To be honest, I'm not using it right now because I'm still learning how to use it more effectively. I'm actually trying to learn more about internet security, and I've noticed that using this add-on is great for protecting your privacy from malicious JavaScript. I highly recommend it. Thank you.
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Heather, kuukausi sittenProbably one of the most essential addons for firefox, next to ublock. Great for security but it's recommended to have a tech background cuz the default settings can break many sites.
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Rifat, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut noewaeda, kaksi kuukautta sittenit's an essential extension. without it, using the internet is like walking directly into a warzone.
on the strict setting, it makes browsing slightly more clunky due to having to give websites some trust, but it's usually not that big of a deal. - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Max Rower, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 2/5kirjoittanut fidius, kaksi kuukautta sittenI uninstalled this extension because it randomly started interfering with browsing due to some nonsense swipe-style gesture 'feature'. Used to be a good extension but I'm not inclined to trust it anymore.
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19773062, kaksi kuukautta sittenDue to a bug that effected mobile scrolling, I disabled Noscript for a day and discovered what a horrible experience browsing was without it.
It seems the bug is now fixed, and in record time too. Thanks Giorgio. Fantastic extension. - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Tsuki, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut tt, kaksi kuukautta sittenNew update gesture feature needs to be removed. Disabling the extention until it's fixed
updating to 5 stars now that gesture feature is turned off by default - Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Kval, kaksi kuukautta sittenRemove gestures or add an option to disable this clunky gesture feature in the settings in the next update. Scrolling is impossible with the current update. For this reason alone, I'm removing this very useful extension for now, until they fix this annoying feature.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Radosław, kaksi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut fcat435, kaksi kuukautta sittenHad to disable the extension because it prevented me from scrolling on pages.
- Arvioitu 2/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 12969656, kaksi kuukautta sittenDitch the gesture on mobile function and will be a 5* extension again.
- Arvioitu 3/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 13428877, kaksi kuukautta sittenI use it a lot and it has been a great tool but had to drop the rating after the new gesture system has been added since for a while I had no idea it had been added and it has made browsing a complete hell on mobile because it can't be disabled so I will have to disable the app until then.
- Arvioitu 2/5kirjoittanut Vee, kaksi kuukautta sittenWas good, but the new gesture system is horrible and makes scrolling on mobile more trouble than it's worth.
This should have never been implemented silently in the background without an option to disable, to begin with. No idea what the dev was thinking.
Had to disable Noscript on mobile until it's fixed. - Arvioitu 5/5kirjoittanut Ivan, kaksi kuukautta sittenThe whole gesture idea thing. First, accessing the settings in Firefox android is the same number of ui interactions once the new ui layout is learned. Second, Imagine if another extension did what you decided to do (the whole Old New Thing "Imagine if two programs did this"). Third, I cannot believe your awesome extension can still be Mozilla recommended after this. 🙁
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 18205130, kaksi kuukautta sittenNow, when I accidentally hold down on the screen, the selection randomly appears. It turns out this extension is to blame. How can I disable it? I can't find anything in the settings. Please give us the opportunity to remove this "gesture".
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 13994127, kaksi kuukautta sittenPlease let us scroll again. Thank you.