Arviot lisäosalle Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context tekijä Wikiwand
143 arviota
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Howar31, seitsemän päivää sittentoo much useless features. settings are not saved keep resetting. and also ads
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Haltarys, kuukausi sittenThe extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19053100, kaksi kuukautta sittenUsed to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19391462, kaksi kuukautta sittenwas a good addon until constant ai ads
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Sciky, kolme kuukautta sittenThis used to be a great extension, but now it's a bloatware full of ads for its AI, what a shame
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Indiana Moon, neljä kuukautta sittenIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 14503325, neljä kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Magik Leo, neljä kuukautta sittenever heard of the word "enshittification"?
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19040033, neljä kuukautta sittenUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Ally Simy, viisi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 19035698, viisi kuukautta sittenEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut LCM, viisi kuukautta sittenThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Milan Regec, viisi kuukautta sittenAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 18996590, viisi kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Toccetness, viisi kuukautta sittenAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 17669402, kuusi kuukautta sittenAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Wolphie, seitsemän kuukautta sittenUsed to be a great extension/addon. Ruined by AI slop that apparently needs to appear everywhere now. Plus constant popups everywhere if cookies are cleared. Sad to see such a beautiful piece of work fall so low.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut winphreak, seitsemän kuukautta sittenI can't wait until the AI screws up all the detailed trivia bits or simple math for a article summary.
Also if Wikiepedia is too hard to read for you, you should probably finish middle school.
This world is gonna get so dumb so fast I can't wait. - Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 12661639, seitsemän kuukautta sitten
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 17046154, kahdeksan kuukautta sittenUsed to be a solid add-on, but now pesters the user to login for "AI tools" every time a Wikipedia link is visited, causing unnecessary bloat and wasting the user's time. Why they absolutely ruined a good add-on is beyond me.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut StephenM, kahdeksan kuukautta sittenIf I want AI, I'll either build my own local solution with whatever LLM I want for free or go to a website or use a separate app. Wikiwands' entire existence for being is to make the Wikipedia layout easier to read. Nothing else. Don't remake it ever. AI Wand, NOT Wikiwand. Utter JUNK made by JUNK developers, supported by JUNK people.
- Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Celena, yhdeksän kuukautta sittenThis used to be a good extension, which I used for many years across different browsers and devices. Today I've had enough and I'm going to uninstall it.
Before they started remaking it, it was very good. It was essentially a better layout for Wikipedia with not much else to it, but that's why I liked it. It made it clearer to read, easier to use, and just overall felt like a more updated version of Wikipedia's UI. Combined with an ad blocker, it was perfect. However, since the remake, it is worthless. It is so bloated. The majority of the page is taken up with AI stuff, and it wants you to use it constantly. It has made the layout even more confusing - while before I felt like it was very intuitive and more Wikipedia like, now it's just added so much more junk and confusing elements. Wikipedia is way easier to use.
With this latest update, I'm done. I was already getting frustrated with the way pictures were handled. If you clicked on it, there would be various bits of information that covered over part of the picture. Then there was so much blackspace that it wasn't always that much more visible than in the article. You zoom in and it's barely better. Now, I tried to look at the picture it used for the cover image, which no longer shows up in the sidebar as well. I clicked on it, and it was much the same as it used to be, although the information/other pictures below now fades away. Good! However I tried zooming in, because it was still not a big picture. It not only barely zoomed in, but moved the maybe two pixels bigger image around with my cursor. So now I had a very vaguely enlarged picture of some people that bounced around as I tried to exit out of it. Cool!!!!!! Good thing I never use Wikipedia to look at things like art as someone who enjoys art history!!!
The AI is too much, the paywall is too much, the needing to have a separate account for it is too much. And now they have continued to just make the UI worse and worse. I'm done here. I'm so sad that this has gone this way. I'm so disappointed. They had something good and it's useless now. I'd rather use normal Wikipedia, and that's the first time I've said that in many years. - Arvioitu 1/5kirjoittanut Firefox-käyttäjä 17490856, yhdeksän kuukautta sitten