Pour utiliser les extensions Android, vous aurez besoin de Firefox pour Android. Pour découvrir les modules complémentaires pour Firefox, veuillez visiter cette page.

Connexion
Icône du module

Critiques pour CanvasBlocker

CanvasBlocker par kkapsner

4,6 étoiles sur 5
5
387
4
41
3
21
2
11
1
21
481 notes
  • par Jezze, il y a 8 ans
    Doesn't make my canvas fingerprint less unique. amiunique.org still tells me that my similarity ratio is below 0.1% which means I have a very unique canvas fingerprint.

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    In the default settings the canvas fingerprint is changed on every page reload (you can test that on http://kkapsner.github.io/CanvasBlocker/test/test.html). Yes - this makes the fingerprint unique but since it is not constant you cannot be tracked.

    If you want further information/discussion please open an issue on https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can communicate nmuch easier.

    PS: similar issue on github: https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues/154
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13835690 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    Thank you for this extension (and for keeping it opensource). Nowadays it's getting harder and harder to get a sense of real privacy. CanvasBlocker + AdGuard for Windows + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + custom user.js helps me feel safer on a growing data collection frenzy.

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    You're welcome.
  • par Mozilla Dev, il y a 8 ans

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    Please provide a reason why you gave one star. Maybe I can fix the issue or improve CB with your input.
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14072583 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    Does not work according to fingerprint test at https://panopticlick.eff.org/

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    What do you mean with "does not work"? Please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can communicate better and therefore I can help better.
  • par ©®°˜, il y a 8 ans
    100% unique mean that is not really natural, canvas should not be unique but changed in order to be natural.
    Unique canvas fingerprints will do much worse.
    Is like you said you have a device that never exist.

    To better understand how this work :
    Google already have a full database with all kind of canvas signatures from all worldwide devices (iphone, android, computers, etc...), and if your canvas signature will not match on them database then you fail, it is a prove that your canvas is fake. If you try to spoof the signature then image pixel parameters will not match and again you fail so is almoust imposible to pass canvas.

    On default settings may make it pass the google test.

    For example google will not ask for SMS confirmation when a new gmail account is created because he trust the device you use.

    Most of people must understand why unique signatures is bad practice and all softwares that spoof parameters will make traking services to detect the device much easy

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    Please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where we can discuss this. AMOs rating comments are too limited to have a good conversation.

    One small comment on unique signatures: they are not bad by itself as long as they are not persistend (i.e. the timestamp you connect to the server is very likely to be a unique signature but it's not persistent). This is the case in the CB default settings.
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14039775 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14037398 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12808354 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    Works Fine
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13965824 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    It's doing it's job
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13954923 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    Excellent.
  • par Gummi, il y a 8 ans
    Can't seem to get version 0.4.4b working with Firefox ESR 52.7.2, there's just no icon visible anywhere on the UI.

    Edit: My bad! I remember that this addon had an icon before but nowadays it hasn't. Works great!

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    This Addon does not have an icon that is always visible. Only a fingerprint icon is displayed in the adress bar when some canvas data was faked for the web page. You can test at http://kkapsner.github.io/CanvasBlocker/test/test.html

    If you still think that it's not working properly try version 0.4.4a and open a new issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues

    EDIT: no problem. Glad that it works for you.
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13837360 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    Keep up the good work and thank you.
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13870378 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13224783 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13793914 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    Not good. Had partial protection before installing add-on. This add-on makes my browser 100% unique.

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    Yes, in the standard settings of CB the fingerprint that is produced with CB is quite unique but not persistent. That means the browser itself (and therefore you) cannot be indentified by it. (The same issue was reportet on github: https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues/154 - if you want further informations you can explore the issues there or post a new one.)

    Also there are a lot of options which change the behaviour of CB (just mark the expert mode). If you want a less unique fingerprint you can use the "white" random number generator which will result in fingerprints similar to those of the Tor browser.
  • par Salsa, il y a 8 ans
  • par containers-everywhere, il y a 8 ans
  • par citizenserious, il y a 8 ans
  • par #98374, il y a 8 ans
  • par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13730996 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
    Hey there, take a look at Browser Console to know about your add-on's error. Keep up a good work.

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    I do not see any errors. Please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues where you can describe the scenario when you see the errors.
  • par William, il y a 8 ans
  • par philrj, il y a 8 ans
  • par BRW, il y a 8 ans
    Perfect!!! Thanks!!!
  • par mibird, il y a 8 ans
    seemingly good help to browse with more privacy, complex work.
    since update from 17dec, blocks all web-pages :(

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    I currently face weird problems. Please open an issue at https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues with all your details (versions, settings, etc.) so that I can find the root cause.

    EDIT: please try version 0.4.4
  • par Fred Thompson, il y a 8 ans
    Description claims there is a whitelist option but...there is no visible way to see, let alone edit, such a list.

    Réponse du développeur

    mis en ligne : il y a 8 ans
    The whitelisting was hidden by the last release. You can whitelist by setting the desired blocking mode for the URL specifically. If you want to whitelist an URL just give it an "allow everything". You can still whitelist a site from the notifications. I should definitely clarify the description...

    Adding an URL specific block mode:
    go to options, click on the triangle next to the blocking mode, enter the domain you want to whitelist, click on the plus, now you can set the blocking mode for the domain.

    PS: you can still enter something in the white list by checking expert mode, open the export settings page and entering something in the whitelist field.

    EDIT: Is the screenshot of the settings not explanatory enough?
    EDIT2: It's easier for us to communicate on github. If you have any questions - just open an issue. Here the communication is slow and not relyable.

    EDIT3: please try version 0.4.4 - there the whitelist is available again.