Critiques pour CanvasBlocker
CanvasBlocker par kkapsner
462 notes
- Noté 2 sur 5par Sampei Nihira, il y a 8 ans@ kkapsner
Please check the link below:
https://www.adidas.it/
is positive for Canvas Defender and ScriptSafe for Chrome.
With CanvasBlocker the icon briefly appears and disappears immediately.
TH.
___________________________
Unable to view single images.
I can insert some links but privately.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 8 ansThanks for your finding. The faking is working fine - just the display of the icon is confused by this site. This will be fixed in the next release (see https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker/issues/149 for reference - btw it's much easier for us to communicate on github via issues than AMO)
Since this is a minor issue there will not be a release for this alone. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13433799 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13433799 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13411330 de Firefox, il y a 8 anscan't get the add on CavasBlocker on the new quantum version beta.Keeps telling me I'm running version 54.0???
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 8 ansPlease recheck your Firefox version and try to add it again. Version 0.4.2 should also run with Firefox 52.4.1 - Noté 5 sur 5par Anonymous, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12901632 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12806971 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansNew features are somewhat confusing for usual users like me. Should I enable transparency blocking?! ot it doesn't matter much?!
Also when updated some options are missing like the "Ignore the most frequent colors".
Also why not to set Random Number to Persistent by default, it will be changed on every browser startup, right?!Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 8 ansThe former versions faked the transparency always. But since this channel is treated differently by the browsers I think it is saver to not fake it. It does not affect the security.
Regarding the missing options: only these options are displayed that are useful with the other selected options. The mentioned "ignore the most frequent colors" is only displayed in expert mode and when faking the read API.
For the default random number generator I ask you to open an issue at github. This has to be discussed in more depth. I myself are not sure what the default should be.