Critiques pour FireMonkey
FireMonkey par erosman
63 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Alexander A., il y a 3 moisIs it possible, by any chance, at some point, to get something like uBlock's procedural cosmetic filters for our UserCSS scripts? CSS is great, but it's a bit lacking in functionality, especially in regex support.
I'm only starting to learn JS, and I imagine it's gonna take a while before I'll be able to write the scripts I need.
Thanks for all your hard work! - Noté 5 sur 5par Alex Alex, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Crend King, il y a 5 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Adán, il y a 6 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par ecompton59, il y a 7 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par jackyzy823, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Grano, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dodge1, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par royalsos, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par tuure, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Brown121, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14571563 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par DavidK2, il y a 2 ansThe UI is much better and more intuitive than that of TemperMonkey.
I really like the distinction between CSS and JS modifications and that I don’t need to use “proprietary” GreaseMonkey functions like GM_addStyle (` /* the CSS goes here */ `).
FireMonkey also doesn’t exhibit the bug that TemperMonkey does — when I navigated the same portal over many pages, it seemed TM kept adding the same CSS script over and over, which, over time, slowed Firefox noticeably (after a while TM reported aplying about 70 scripts instead of 2!). - Noté 5 sur 5par ImQP, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Frantishek, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ben SALT.id, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par idealth, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Modenium, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Rayke, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par emacsomancer, il y a 3 ansIt is indeed super lightweight. A nice advantage to being on Firefox, as it's not available elsewhere.
- Noté 5 sur 5par serotonin_2a, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par MoiceVail, il y a 3 ans