Critiques pour Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool
Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool par LanguageTooler GmbH
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20013628 de Firefox
Noté 1 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20013628 de Firefox, il y a un moisWas never that good to begin with, not sure why i even kept it around this long, the suggestions were almost always worse than what I've already came up with.
5 252 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13651036 de Firefox, il y a 2 heuresТеперь даже бесплатно нельзя использовать.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20122884 de Firefox, il y a 7 heuresWas good until it ask to pay to work (unless you want an extension that just say "use premium to use extension", so not "Some features may require payment" ...
- Noté 1 sur 5par Natolix, il y a 10 heuresL'extension nous demande de payer pour l'utiliser. Elle était bien, mais elle ne sert strictement plus à rien maintenant.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20081746 de Firefox, il y a un jourNie dość, że słabe to teraz jeszcze wymuszają premium, żeby w ogóle działało. Podziękuję za tę wątpliwą przyjemność.
- Noté 5 sur 5par David, il y a un jour
- Noté 1 sur 5par DONTBLAMEMEM8, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20118795 de Firefox, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19755324 de Firefox, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20118462 de Firefox, il y a 2 joursUseless, doesnt do anything unless you pay for a premium subscription. For a simple spell checker thats terrible. It was awesome for the first week, before I realised I was using a free tiral for the premium version. All this did was highlight how well a simple spell checker can work, but with zero basic features its entirely useless. Im not signing up to a subscription for a simple spell checker.
- Noté 1 sur 5par drthmik, il y a 3 joursUsed this for YEARS
Was a great free app that checked spelling and grammar with options for more in premium
Now they want $70 a year to do the same thing
EVERYTHING is premium
I'll be deleting this app IMMEDIATELY after submitting
Truly awful, would give 0 stars if I could - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19681566 de Firefox, il y a 3 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par M01t3n, il y a 3 joursI used this tool for several months and and had a good experience with it for a long time, however, the recent changes make it unusable as an extension without paying.
Prior to this, I would have given it a 5-star rating, and should have, but I cannot currently do so given the price.
I wish for the best and hope that it does well, though I will personally not continue using it for the foreseeable future, even if I understand the reasoning behind the changes. If you are willing to pay for its services however, it is very high quality and I experienced few, if any issues with it. - Noté 1 sur 5par raxa, il y a 4 jours"We have made the difficult decision to limit the use of LanguageTool’s browser extension to Premium users only."
Ah yes using the browser extention is paid but you can still install it for "free" ... yes ... i'm shure it will help to not died again free ai ... - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20115663 de Firefox, il y a 4 joursGREEDY EXTENSION. NOW ASKS FOR MONEY JUST FOR USE IT.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Аноним, il y a 4 joursIt worked badly, contains lot of misspells, and recently developers just removed free usage. It was 3 of 5 early, now worse then 1/5
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13908078 de Firefox, il y a 5 joursThis extension established itself at a time when there were few alternatives, giving it a firm market share in its category. But now, when there are a bunch of alternatives to choose from, you decide to put every single feature behind a paywall?
You deserve to make some money out of your work but damn, that is a wild decision. - Noté 1 sur 5par loomloon, il y a 5 jours
- Noté 2 sur 5par Nícholas Kegler, il y a 5 joursIt was good, but I often had issues with the extension. It was full of bugs. Recently, after accepting changes, it stopped replacing the original text correctly and would basically concatenate the old text with the corrected version.
Now they want to start charging for usage, which is fine— I get it. But at least make the product reliable before asking people to pay for it. - Noté 1 sur 5par Tim, il y a 5 joursWhen using any of the non-American English languages, I found that many words are missing. Absolutely bizarre that it doesn't have all the words in from the big dictionaries as a base-line. This was ok when it was free, but I'm not paying for a spell checker that doesn't know what's in the dictionary. You know your AI is slopping it up when Word 97 does a better job.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Rvier.fr, il y a 5 joursNo free tiers anymore. Require a premium account, so identification required. And add difficulty to run his own hosted server.
- Noté 1 sur 5par treilly94, il y a 5 joursWas great until they wanted to charge a monthly subscription
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17759722 de Firefox, il y a 5 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par defcon2XX8, il y a 5 jours