Critiques pour Local Filesystem Links
Local Filesystem Links par austrALIENsun, AWolf
22 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17428531 de Firefox, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15785508 de Firefox, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14178941 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansHi There! I love your add-on! I am having an issue, however, where single-clicking the link opens Windows Explorer multiple times (1-3 Explorer windows pop open). Otherwise, GREAT!
- Noté 5 sur 5par tibo77, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par jumpi, il y a 6 ansI use it to open networks links in my own docuwiki, works well!!
Thanks a lot :o)) - Noté 5 sur 5par Bald Superhero, il y a 6 ansEXCELLENT! works perfectly - removes the barrier of not being able to get to local files in my browser based support call application.
- Noté 5 sur 5par wieland, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par mbit, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15262706 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansGreat add-on,
I made an Electronic Document Management for my company, with firefox until release 60.0.1 using this settings.:
lockPref("capability.policy.localfilelinks.checkloaduri.enabled", "allAccess");
lockPref("capability.policy.localfilelinks.sites", "http://localwebserver");
lockPref("capability.policy.policynames", "localfilelinks");
lockPref("capability.principal.codebase.p0.granted", "UniversalFileRead");
lockPref("capability.principal.codebase.p0.id", "http://localwebserver");
in my EDM, depending of a status in a database, the script launch in firefox a popup windows witch open the document on a network share.
Is it possible that our add-on scans the header's page for something like:
window.open("file:///I:/a_folder/a_file"...
and directly open the file without having to clic on a link on the page?
If I can, I'd like to help you.
Vincent. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15046829 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15030801 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14593426 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Robert, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par rixtech, il y a 7 ansThis is a great add on that just makes the workday easier.
Sure, there are a whole lot of philosophical arguments about why you shouldn't need to use a local filesystem explorer, or that IE should never have made us lazy back in the 90s. But the reality in real workplaces is that users have a mix of browsers on a mix of OSes talking to a mix of fileshares and content management services, and there is usually no project willing to pay for revising legacy document links. Add ons like this one help you to get on with the work you're paid to do instead of wrestling with the foibles of your PC and dealing with legacy cruft that builds up as "best practice" evolves. - Noté 5 sur 5par Adarsh Madrecha, il y a 7 ansSimple amazing plugin. Extremely useful. It opens local files and folder which is not possible using standard Firefox functionality.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14133066 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansThinks for your donation,it helps me a lot
- Noté 5 sur 5par Daniel, il y a 8 ansGreat extension, really helpful. Thank you! Is slower than the versions before Firefox quantum, but it's working!
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 8 ansGreat to hear that you find the addon useful. Our primary goal was to make the addon working on Firefox Quantum at all and ship it as quickly as possible. Performance issues are addressed in later steps. - Noté 5 sur 5par diy1966, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Bill Stidham, il y a 8 ansHave it frozen to 0.99.47
I am NOT installing a separate piece of software so this can function
This extension works fine but webextension API is a POS
working around firefox's webextension API BS is becoming very time consuming for meRéponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 8 ansThe 2-component-architecture was the best way we came up with with regard to limitations of the WebExtensions API. I am aware that this is not optimal but what can be done instead? - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13461379 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans