Critiques pour Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike par Dmitry Selivanov
Avis de Dmitry Selivanov
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 14 joursGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing.
4 733 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Zelgadis-San, il y a un jour
- Noté 5 sur 5par Juraj Mäsiar, il y a 5 joursThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13519206 de Firefox, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18900251 de Firefox, il y a 7 joursThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 6 joursI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Noté 5 sur 5par Riku70X, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par malisipi, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par placidtea, il y a 11 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Spigot, il y a 12 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dale Cooper, il y a 13 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18909402 de Firefox, il y a 13 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Kiwi18, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15889624 de Firefox, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Cameron Owens, il y a 15 joursI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 14 joursGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Noté 1 sur 5par kuroten, il y a 17 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Nicky McCurdy, il y a 17 joursThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18144459 de Firefox, il y a 17 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19547104 de Firefox, il y a 18 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par qawas, il y a 18 joursStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 18 joursMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 6120711 de Firefox, il y a 19 joursasking for premium for such a simple addon
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 18 joursMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Noté 2 sur 5par Chantelle, il y a 19 joursThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 18 joursYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.- Noté 1 sur 5par lily, il y a 21 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par PhobosAnomaly, il y a 21 joursYou're not getting my money for something that hardly works anymore, get off my computer
- Noté 5 sur 5par exo, il y a 21 jours