Recenzije za 'Improve YouTube!' š§ (For YouTube & Video)
'Improve YouTube!' š§ (For YouTube & Video) od code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
Recenzija od Korisnik Firefoxa 18401954
Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5
od Korisnik Firefoxa 18401954, prije godinuUw gegevens voor websites in het āgenoemdeā domein benaderen
De extensie kan de inhoud van webpaginaās die u in het opgegeven domein bezoekt lezen, evenals gegevens die u in deze webpaginaās invoert, zoals gebruikersnamen en wachtwoorden.
De extensie kan de inhoud van webpaginaās die u in het opgegeven domein bezoekt lezen, evenals gegevens die u in deze webpaginaās invoert, zoals gebruikersnamen en wachtwoorden.
776 recenzija
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Yevhen Tretiakov, prije 6 sati
- Ocijenjeno s 3 od 5od stapuft, prije 5 danaWorks allright, but on mobile, you have tonswitch to "desktop mode" to make some features work, like automatically redirecting from the shitty "shorts" page to the actual YouTube page for the video.
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 15 satiHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will.
This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering).
The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here.) - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od PP, prije 7 danaSeems to work for me. Haven't come across any issues for my uses
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Lakyn, prije 8 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od MetalGear89, prije 8 danaFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Ocijenjeno s 2 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 19465923, prije 12 danaThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 18989911, prije 12 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 2 od 5od TS, prije 15 danaIt's very hit or miss if any of its features actually work on mobile. The interface is trash and the prevent autoplay toggle blocks the video from loading entirely.
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 15 satihi! This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here - Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 15037318, prije 16 danaIt does not even allow me to watch youtube videos after I had installed it!
Test it before making it available! - Ocijenjeno s 3 od 5od ueeu, prije 17 danaVery good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UIOdgovor programera
objavljeno prije 15 satiYou mean full replacement UI?
There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox. - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Vangxim, prije 19 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od SzymonL, prije 19 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17491097, prije 20 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Cboom, prije 22 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Ivia Relle, prije 22 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od HoĆ ng Hįŗ£i Hįŗu, prije 25 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 4 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 16779275, prije 25 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od coldcoffee, prije mjesec
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od DOT, prije mjesec
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 19242234, prije mjesecThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 23 danaHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We can also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).