Pohódnoćenja za AdNauseam
AdNauseam wot Daniel Howe
Pohódnoćenje wot Wužiwar Firefox 14491390
Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot Wužiwar Firefox 14491390, 8 yıl önceSorry in advance, this is more a reply than a review and I guess reviews are not for discussion, but does user 8562d0 realise that Ublock Origin is GPL and that AdNauseam does acknowledge it uses it as a foundation and is also GPL? "Ripoff" is not really a thing in this context.
And as for dismissing AdNauseam based on reading studies about the effectiveness of data obfuscation, this extension’s authors actually write this kind of studies, so surely they have some idea of what they’re doing.
And as for dismissing AdNauseam based on reading studies about the effectiveness of data obfuscation, this extension’s authors actually write this kind of studies, so surely they have some idea of what they’re doing.
662 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot wmw, bir gün önce
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Saiv46, 2 gün önce
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19790807, 11 gün önce
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot KMantle42, 17 gün önceThere's not a single ad blocker that blocks every ad, so I have multiple ad blockers enabled. The single one that has a problem with it is AdNauseam, who whenever I open Firefox it turns itself off and asks me to delete every other ad blocker.
No, I'm not doing that. I rather delete AdNauseam - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Chill, bir ay önce
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot mrlol, bir ay önce
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot StubbleName, bir ay önceThe best ad blocker of all time. Better than uBlock Origin, because it is a fork of uBlock Origin, but with a few features that make it MUCH nicer to use. Also for those wondering, it does block ads on YouTube.
Brief:
1. It worked as expected, and worked beyond my expectations.
2. Features I love:
a. Ad vault: all past ads in a timeline with links and images
b. Blocked count is of ads, not of total elements or features
c. The message it is trying to push: websites must stop tracking the user with ads.
d. The way it pushes that message: poisining data and costing websites that track money
e. The performance and reliability: never have I seen an ad not blocked
f. Works on youtube
g. User choice regarding costing websites that don't track money and blocking non-tracking ads
h. Still has the uBlock UI easily accessible for element blocking and beyond
3. It is extremely useful
4. It is dead easy to use
5. I will continue to use this extension until the end of time itself.
I urge you to try it. Please. It is worth it, I promise. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Rukas, bir ay önceThis extension was made for the purpose of screwing with advertisers and making them lose their money...
That's why I recommend using it! :D
The only issue I have is that the logo looks like... Something odd... Y'know what I mean? - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Pondering Wanderer, bir ay önce
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot LemonMeringueTy, 4 ay önce
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13248877, 6 ay önceWorks extremely well on YouTube ads and similar things. Many other sites don't seem to be supported, though. Fragrantica, for example, is just a mess even with this installed. Blocking elements doesn't even matter because they reappear within seconds. I'd love to completely replace uBlock origin with this, but it seems like this has a lot of compatibility issues which uBlock doesn't have. Probably switching back soon.
EDIT: Ads also weren't being blocked at all on the Smithsonian site, which seems to use the same type of ad delivery as Fragrantica. I'd much rather have an adblocker which actually works. Messing with advertisers is awesome, but not at the cost of seeing ads on the internet again. Back to uBlock for me.