Pohódnoćenja za IPvFoo
IPvFoo wot Paul Marks
Pohódnoćenje wot Wužiwar Firefox 14049879
Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot Wužiwar Firefox 14049879, 8 years agoDoes not work on my system: In the column where the ip should appear, there it says only "access denied".
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
41 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot imcdona, a month ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot vertigont17, 7 months ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wolf786, 8 months ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tempdirz, 9 months ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17087931, a year ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18373085, 2 years agoexactly what I was looking for... Thanks!
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot tux, 2 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tim, 2 years agoFor those worried about "Access your data for all websites", this is an unavoidable problem with addon permission scopes. Put by the purported (likely?) author on a forum:
> IPvFoo author here. The problem is that there's no way to obtain the (hostname, ip) stream from Chrome/Firefox without requesting the "all websites" permission.
> In theory, browser vendors could define a narrowly-scoped permission that only reports (hostname, ip), or roll this functionality into the browser UI, but neither seems likely to happen.
> I made IPvFoo to promote IPv6 adoption, and wouldn't consider selling it for less than $10M USD. It probably won't ever be worth that much because it's an easily-cloned utility without a "moat", but it's more rational to set a price than refuse to sell under any circumstances.
The addon is open source, and if you insisted, could be built/installed manually. However, I trust it for now from here on AMO.
UPDATE: Thanks for confirming, Paul!Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so 2 years ago napisał> purported (likely?) author
Yes, that was me (p1mrx on HN) - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Sharky, 2 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot 葉稔, 3 years ago
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Baptiste, 3 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Caliban, 3 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Rodolfo R@mírez..., 4 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot gomers., 4 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16855318, 4 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot takeshi0303, 5 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13845156, 5 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16393218, 5 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Abdul Rauf, 5 years agoThis should be the recommended extension by firefox. Source code is available at https://github.com/pmarks-net/ipvfoo so I think this can be trusted after review
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot somnitek, 5 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot hbermon, 6 years ago
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Marcone C.A, 6 years ago