Pohódnoćenja za IPvFoo
IPvFoo wot Paul Marks
Pohódnoćenje wot Wužiwar Firefox 14049879
Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot Wužiwar Firefox 14049879, 7 jierren lynDoes not work on my system: In the column where the ip should appear, there it says only "access denied".
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
40 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot vertigont17, 3 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wolf786, 4 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tempdirz, 5 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17087931, ien jier lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18373085, 2 jierren lynexactly what I was looking for... Thanks!
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot tux, 2 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tim, 2 jierren lynFor those worried about "Access your data for all websites", this is an unavoidable problem with addon permission scopes. Put by the purported (likely?) author on a forum:
> IPvFoo author here. The problem is that there's no way to obtain the (hostname, ip) stream from Chrome/Firefox without requesting the "all websites" permission.
> In theory, browser vendors could define a narrowly-scoped permission that only reports (hostname, ip), or roll this functionality into the browser UI, but neither seems likely to happen.
> I made IPvFoo to promote IPv6 adoption, and wouldn't consider selling it for less than $10M USD. It probably won't ever be worth that much because it's an easily-cloned utility without a "moat", but it's more rational to set a price than refuse to sell under any circumstances.
The addon is open source, and if you insisted, could be built/installed manually. However, I trust it for now from here on AMO.
UPDATE: Thanks for confirming, Paul!Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so 2 jierren lyn napisał> purported (likely?) author
Yes, that was me (p1mrx on HN) - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Sharky, 2 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot 葉稔, 3 jierren lyn
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Baptiste, 3 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Caliban, 3 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Rodolfo R@mírez..., 3 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot gomers., 4 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16855318, 4 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot takeshi0303, 4 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13845156, 4 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16393218, 4 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Abdul Rauf, 5 jierren lynThis should be the recommended extension by firefox. Source code is available at https://github.com/pmarks-net/ipvfoo so I think this can be trusted after review
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot somnitek, 5 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot hbermon, 5 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Marcone C.A, 6 jierren lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot 章灵北, 6 jierren lynThanks!a VERY perfect extension to view whether the website give priority to IPV6.