Pohódnoćenja za IPvFoo
IPvFoo wot Paul Marks
Pohódnoćenje wot Wužiwar Firefox 14049879
Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot Wužiwar Firefox 14049879, před 8 letyDoes not work on my system: In the column where the ip should appear, there it says only "access denied".
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
41 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot imcdona, před 4 měsíci
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot vertigont17, před 10 měsíci
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wolf786, před 10 měsíci
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tempdirz, před rokem
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17087931, před rokem
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18373085, před 2 letyexactly what I was looking for... Thanks!
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot tux, před 2 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tim, před 2 letyFor those worried about "Access your data for all websites", this is an unavoidable problem with addon permission scopes. Put by the purported (likely?) author on a forum:
> IPvFoo author here. The problem is that there's no way to obtain the (hostname, ip) stream from Chrome/Firefox without requesting the "all websites" permission.
> In theory, browser vendors could define a narrowly-scoped permission that only reports (hostname, ip), or roll this functionality into the browser UI, but neither seems likely to happen.
> I made IPvFoo to promote IPv6 adoption, and wouldn't consider selling it for less than $10M USD. It probably won't ever be worth that much because it's an easily-cloned utility without a "moat", but it's more rational to set a price than refuse to sell under any circumstances.
The addon is open source, and if you insisted, could be built/installed manually. However, I trust it for now from here on AMO.
UPDATE: Thanks for confirming, Paul!Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so před 2 lety napisał> purported (likely?) author
Yes, that was me (p1mrx on HN) - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Sharky, před 3 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot 葉稔, před 3 lety
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Baptiste, před 3 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Caliban, před 3 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Rodolfo R@mírez..., před 4 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot gomers., před 5 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16855318, před 5 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot takeshi0303, před 5 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13845156, před 5 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16393218, před 5 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Abdul Rauf, před 5 letyThis should be the recommended extension by firefox. Source code is available at https://github.com/pmarks-net/ipvfoo so I think this can be trusted after review
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot somnitek, před 5 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot hbermon, před 6 lety
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Marcone C.A, před 6 lety