They use AI for their detections. In addition to that, they mark victims and incorrectly mark LGBT people and people with age regression, which is a trauma response. They mark any sort of non-standard English text as potentially malicious. I would only trust this to track people who've been in condo servers. Even then, it's a privacy risk. They log your messages on several Discord servers, of which they're not allowed to, as it goes against Discord's TOS. They track their users using any means available to them. And they are just in general unsafe and inaccurate. Please consider using your brain instead of a tool to think for you and what to think about people. And for reference, I have not been marked by this tool. I am simply someone with common sense.

Falsely flags users based on faulty evidence, stay far away

10% useful, but it is a data scraper, first, the GDPR aurgements are weak, this is the same as little ol' double counter, their ticket itself says it violates gdpr by giving a response time of 3-6 weeks, the GDPR max response time is a month

to be more clear

- GDPR article 12(3) violation (their own words!)

- GDPR Article 12(1) violation, site and privacy policy stating different things about the contact email, " Business inquiries only. For appeals or support, use the live chat." "contact@rotector.com is monitored primarily for business inquiries. We accept rights requests sent here and will respond, but the support chat is faster for verification.",

- most likely GDPR Article 12(2) violation

ill update this once they respond to my ticket, and say how much my rights got violated, or not violated, this review will be deleted once the system has updated to address all data privacy concerns, or till i have been proven wrong

I found the tool interesting, but I noticed it's unfairly flagging me. I don't even know how to find a condo.

In practice, the tool's intentions seem good, but it gives a lot of false positives, which makes it seem more like an unjustified witch hunt.

Vibecoded app that relies on AI for detections, which is shown to be unreliable. Should be fully moderated by humans.