Recensioni per AdNauseam
AdNauseam di Daniel Howe
Recensione di Utente Firefox 14333591
Valutata 4 su 5
di Utente Firefox 14333591, 8 anni faFirst let me say, I LOVE this extension. Any computer I get my hands on, mine or not, gets AdNauseam installed on it. I recommend it to everyone I know, and have the chrome version ready to go at a moment's notice, despite not even using chrome.
My ONLY qualm is not with the philosophy of AdNauseam, which I completely ascribe to, or any of the behavior it normally displays.
However, sometimes the filter lists require updating, but they NEVER get updated. I can wait for an hour and nothing will happen, and there's no indication of how long it will take for it to finish. What's worse is that a page refresh seems to stop the updating of the filter list s altogether, and set me back to where I started. Even changing the process priority to -20 does nothing. The only success I've had with remedying this problem is removing and reinstalling.
I only wish there were more information about this problem other than that it takes a lot of CPU to update the lists.
My ONLY qualm is not with the philosophy of AdNauseam, which I completely ascribe to, or any of the behavior it normally displays.
However, sometimes the filter lists require updating, but they NEVER get updated. I can wait for an hour and nothing will happen, and there's no indication of how long it will take for it to finish. What's worse is that a page refresh seems to stop the updating of the filter list s altogether, and set me back to where I started. Even changing the process priority to -20 does nothing. The only success I've had with remedying this problem is removing and reinstalling.
I only wish there were more information about this problem other than that it takes a lot of CPU to update the lists.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 8 anni faCan you create a ticket for this (https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/issues) so that we can take a look?
664 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Daniel Main, 5 giorni fa
- Valutata 3 su 5di Utente Firefox 16315383, 7 giorni faI'd love to use it, but the settings keep getting deleted after browser restart, and this has been an issue for over a year now. I will use uBO Until they have fixed this bug.
- Valutata 5 su 5di wmw, 12 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Saiv46, 13 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19790807, 23 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di KMantle42, un mese faThere's not a single ad blocker that blocks every ad, so I have multiple ad blockers enabled. The single one that has a problem with it is AdNauseam, who whenever I open Firefox it turns itself off and asks me to delete every other ad blocker.
No, I'm not doing that. I rather delete AdNauseam - Valutata 5 su 5di Chill, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di StubbleName, 2 mesi faThe best ad blocker of all time. Better than uBlock Origin, because it is a fork of uBlock Origin, but with a few features that make it MUCH nicer to use. Also for those wondering, it does block ads on YouTube.
Brief:
1. It worked as expected, and worked beyond my expectations.
2. Features I love:
a. Ad vault: all past ads in a timeline with links and images
b. Blocked count is of ads, not of total elements or features
c. The message it is trying to push: websites must stop tracking the user with ads.
d. The way it pushes that message: poisining data and costing websites that track money
e. The performance and reliability: never have I seen an ad not blocked
f. Works on youtube
g. User choice regarding costing websites that don't track money and blocking non-tracking ads
h. Still has the uBlock UI easily accessible for element blocking and beyond
3. It is extremely useful
4. It is dead easy to use
5. I will continue to use this extension until the end of time itself.
I urge you to try it. Please. It is worth it, I promise. - Valutata 5 su 5di Pondering Wanderer, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di LemonMeringueTy, 5 mesi fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 13248877, 6 mesi faWorks extremely well on YouTube ads and similar things. Many other sites don't seem to be supported, though. Fragrantica, for example, is just a mess even with this installed. Blocking elements doesn't even matter because they reappear within seconds. I'd love to completely replace uBlock origin with this, but it seems like this has a lot of compatibility issues which uBlock doesn't have. Probably switching back soon.
EDIT: Ads also weren't being blocked at all on the Smithsonian site, which seems to use the same type of ad delivery as Fragrantica. I'd much rather have an adblocker which actually works. Messing with advertisers is awesome, but not at the cost of seeing ads on the internet again. Back to uBlock for me.