Recensioni per Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool di LanguageTooler GmbH
5162 recensioni
- It was okay, I only chose this over others as it was the least annoying. Not amazing, I never engaged much with the AI side (as in using it to fully refine things) but it got context better than others did when suggesting fixes, so there's 2 stars. But no, I'm not going to pay for it because it has AI rewrite features, because I don't use those, just grammar and spelling fixes.
It's unfortunate they have to make it premium only because not enough people are paying for it, but maybe that's because it's not *amazing*, just cheaper than Grammarly.
I think another reviewer put it perfectly; LT saves you the time it takes to open up an LLM and paste your text in. And now that on firefox you can have most LLMs just pop up in the sidebar, it really doesn't take that long. - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 6107870, 19 ore fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di kackhaspie, 21 ore fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 20074616, un giorno fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Nebulous_Phage, un giorno faWas a handy tool! Shame that they decided to paywall this to premium. Removed and uninstalled.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 20073181, 2 giorni faUnfortunately, they decided to switch to Premium only for very dubious, greedy reasons. So I will no longer be using it.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Anaverageuser, 2 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 14750288, 2 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Fenrir Strange, 3 giorni faThis was a wonderful little tool for years, it is neither unique enough, nor useful enough to me to pay for this now that they want to blame AI for the change to paid premium service for spelling and grammar. y'all lost your damned minds over AI and got greedy
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18875723, 3 giorni faShame on the decision to monetise. Was great while it lasted.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Johnba98, 3 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Moon Shot, 3 giorni faWent premium, not useful enough, nor unique enough to pay for, especially when all it actually does is save you typing it into chat GPT with the prompt "refine this:" followed by your text.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 20013628, 3 giorni faWas never that good to begin with, not sure why i even kept it around this long, the suggestions were almost always worse than what I've already came up with.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Dmitry, 4 giorni faQuoting privacy policy:
> Content we collect also includes information about your browsing session and the content of websites visited when using our browser extensions. Depending on the Service you’re using, this may include the content and metadata of all websites you’re visiting during your active browser session (e.g. website text, media, publisher and author names, URLs).
It's spyware. Even if you pay for that, which I regret doing.
Interesting nuance is that I believe couple of years ago it was not like this. Since US company (probably private equity) bought this, it turned into spyware. - Valutata 1 su 5di a_bored_browser_and_writer, 4 giorni faThis worked great for me for many years. Unfortunately, now the basic function of spelling and grammar fixes are locked behind the premium service, so it's basically useless outside of the in-browser editor for me. How sad that they've done this.
- Valutata 1 su 5di lg, 4 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 19605199, 4 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 20067703, 4 giorni faLes fonctionnalités de base de l'extension ne sont plus disponibles gratuitement, je peux comprendre. Mais, il n'y a pas de formule "basique" à coût réduit, on nous impose la version premium qu'on ait ou non besoin des fonctionnalités supplémentaires. 50€ par an pour des fonctionnalité qui ne m'intéresse pas, c'est sans moi.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Davide, 4 giorni faYou have to pay an abo to use the app, not just some features, the description and info of this extension are misleading
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 20066961, 5 giorni fa