Recensioni per Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool di LanguageTooler GmbH
Recensione di Utente Firefox 20106540
Valutata 1 su 5
di Utente Firefox 20106540, 3 giorni faSpell checker doesn't need to be related to AI. All you do is burn resources and kill the planet. Paying to submit text to AI for spell check is absurd.
5236 recensioni
- Valutata 2 su 5di Nícholas Kegler, 3 ore faIt was good, but I often had issues with the extension. It was full of bugs. Recently, after accepting changes, it stopped replacing the original text correctly and would basically concatenate the old text with the corrected version.
Now they want to start charging for usage, which is fine— I get it. But at least make the product reliable before asking people to pay for it. - When using any of the non-American English languages, I found that many words are missing. Absolutely bizarre that it doesn't have all the words in from the big dictionaries as a base-line. This was ok when it was free, but I'm not paying for a spell checker that doesn't know what's in the dictionary. You know your AI is slopping it up when Word 97 does a better job.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 17759722, 5 ore fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di defcon2XX8, 5 ore fa
- Major privacy concern. The extension's privacy policy states that it can collect and store text, prompts, chats, files, metadata, IP addresses, usage data, and browsing-related information. It also states that collected data may be used for analytics, service improvement, and AI model training.
I only want a text-correction tool. Sending and retaining this much data is unacceptable for such a basic function, especially when handling potentially sensitive text. EU and especially US users should carefully consider the privacy implications before installing this extension. - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 20111655, 14 ore faWas free for basic functionality, now all features require subscription.
- Valutata 3 su 5di Chris Hayes, 15 ore fa$6 / month for a grammar checker is too much. Seems like the extension is just trying to capitalize on the AI hype. LanguageTool has been a reliable alternative to Grammarly for years, so only docking 2 stars.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 14073020, un giorno faLocking the browser extension behind a fire wall is a scumy thing to do.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 16675063, 2 giorni faGreat free tool until it gave in to greed, will wait for an alternative
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 20109001, 2 giorni faWorked great until it didn't. But asking way too much for a spellchecker.
I don't mind paying for things, would have been happy to give £10 for a perpetual license.
But £4 a month?! Taking the piss m8. Uninstalled. - Valutata 1 su 5di AlkseeyaKC, 2 giorni faIt was great until they wanted money for it. Sorry, but not everyone has $15 they can dish out to all these companies pay walling us. Maybe I would consider if it was cheaper and I had more income, but I don't. BECAUSE OF ALL THE GD SUBSCRIPTIONS to live my life!
- Valutata 1 su 5di Moulin, 2 giorni faDommage, c'était une très bonne extensions mais devenue payante. Alors que "nos abonnés Premium soutiennent déjà l’essentiel de nos coûts de serveurs"... Sous prétexte de développé des nouveaux outils IA dont personne ne veux...
- Valutata 1 su 5di NXY, 4 giorni faNo longer free to use. All features are locked behind a paywall after a short period of use.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Evissam, 4 giorni faIt's straight garbage now. It claims that "Some features may require payment," that isn't true. It works for a while, then tells you your premium trial expired, and it stops working.