Icegger-it OM_RA
17 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Lampe2020, un anno faI don't know why this isn't core functionality in Firefox and why this extension isn't among Mozilla's "Recommended" either.
This extension is an immediate improvement, because I now have a much easier time understanding source files that I open in Firefox.
Some slight changes for this to be perfect would be to enable autodetect by default and to choose a more contrasty colour scheme by default (Qt Creator Light/Dark maybe) so the highlighted text doesn't fade into the background. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Mohammad Banisaeid, 3 anni fa
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 4 anni faYes, that's correct: raw files (with a few exceptions that won't work, those on raw.githubusercontent.com being a notable one).
We could technically inject the library code to colour elements on regular pages, but I wouldn't really know what to colour exactly, it depends too much on the page. Doing all `` blocks could be a thing maybe, or we could imagine adding a feature to selectively colour a block, but there's nothing of the sort supported by the add-on at the moment.- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 16892439, 5 anni fa
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 7 anni faThanks for the feedback, and sorry to hear that about the GitHub raw files :(. In case you haven't seen it already, there are explanations about it here [0].
For the color schemes, I'm relying on the schemes providing by highlight.js. I don't really have the motivation for adding an “import” feature (but would possibly accept a PR). I'll file an issue to acknowledge and keep track of the request, though.
[0] https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/8- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14068156, 8 anni fa
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 8 anni faThanks for using the add-on, and for your feedback!
If the settings are not saved, this is a bug, I'll try to investigate. Any chance you can tell me about your OS and Firefox version, please? Here or on this GitHub issue: https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/9- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur enderandpeter, 8 anni faI thought it was missing PHP, but it was just not in an obvious place. There's an initial list of what I guess are commonly requested languages and then suddenly it's an alphabetical list. Maybe the whole thing should be alphabetical for such a long list.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 8 anni faThank you for the feedback!
The library that is used by the add-on makes a distinction between a set of “most-common languages”, and all other languages it supports. For technical reasons, this add-on initially supported just this restricted set of languages. When I added all the other ones (including PHP), I appended them to the list. So in fact this makes two alphabetical lists: a first one with the “most-common languages” (as presented by the library, I'm not actually trying to classify languages here), and a second one below, with all other languages.
I understand that this might be confusing. Maybe I will change it in the future. Ideally, I would like to implement an option to switch between the complete list of languages, or just the restricted subset. One advantage would be that auto-detection goes much faster when the library is compiled for fewer languages…
Anyway, thanks again! - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13189945, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12504175, 9 anni faThanks for the update to the new framework!