Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool에 대한 리뷰
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 제작자: LanguageTooler GmbH
리뷰 50개
- 5점 만점에 2점Adam Baker 님, 2달 전Money-grubbing BS. Useless for anything longer than 1,000 words, unless you upgrade to the paid version.
Still better than Firefox's default dictionary, but not by much. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 18867700 님, 2달 전Dark mode for every website. Take care of your eyes, use dark theme for night and daily browsing.
- 5점 만점에 2점Endless Fantasy 님, 5달 전Two stars for not including an option to select, an “Any dialect” in the which dialect to use dropdown, or select multiple as a bubble, as either a basic or advanced option.
I consider this a critical feature of any language tool, especially a spell check.
I'd also like to be able to select “Show both as a suggestion” For these features of premium let alone recommend it as a user I want more freedom of expression in how I type, sometimes to type in standard “wrong” variations and even recommend them (The horror!!!):
Wrong Punctuation
Incorrect Word Combinations
Advanced Missing Commas
Foreign Terms
It's also lacking several important features such as custom dictionaries from what I can tell.
There's no excuse for not loading from standard formats for this.
Review was edited using this software.
The software also disguises telling you about "Advanced" errors, as a form of very blatant advertisement, and front-loads its AI paraphrasing, and rewriting system as much as it reasonably can without impacting the user experience.
As a user I don't want this, I don't want to know if I made an advanced spelling mistake, because I know that The software does not support that because I read the page, I expect no scanning, not ad's for scanning disguised as good faith showcasing of your product, or the user's failures.
It needs to be a default off option like "Enable scanning of user text for premium features, to warn user about their mistakes" would be ideal.
There's not even any options clutter yet, good work, but its not configurable enough.
Id say my review rating is: Stalker HoC's reception. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14065901 님, 7달 전Not so great if you are multilingual. I understand projects like this need money but the pathological need to show premium upgrade ads in the UI over usability of the product shows the priority is not helping you the user. Also don't fake having a language available in the setting and then not be able to spell check it.
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 15291916 님, 8달 전A spellchecker that only works on some sites, and not others, has limited usefulness. Would be better if it could run here, but its options don't even show the "Run on sites with restrictions" option as it ought to.
Edit: It used to work on wireclub.com's chats, and now it doesn't. More useless than ever before. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 13381346 님, 10달 전Wenn sie immer funktonieren würde könnte ich mir überlegen dafür zu bezahlen. Nachdem das leider nicht so ist, sehe ich nicht ein auch nur 1 Cent dafür auszugeben
개발자 답글
10달 전에 게시됨Bitte kontaktiere uns doch im Forum (https://forum.languagetool.org) mit einer genaueren Fehlerbeschreibung. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 12233941 님, 10달 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14558740 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 18378284 님, 일 년 전Great except it keeps on pushing premium only issues in my face, honestly ruins it.
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14637886 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Blighted Despot 님, 일 년 전
- At first it seemed nice, but it's been getting in the way. At first it passively highlighted problem areas for me to review, but today it's been agressively throwing up dialogs on its own, blocking my work. It also abuses its access to my attention by marking an error but pitching it's paid service when I click on the text. It does have a good dictionary (much better than the native Firefox spell checker) but the gramar engine is stuck on pedantic. It enforces rules that aren't required unless you're writing a formal document. The last straw was when it started trying to autocomplete sentences. Today I typed, "work address:" and it threw my actual work address (and how does it know my real work address?) into the email. I ignored it but the suggestion kept popping up as I edited that part of the email. It ultimately inserted the address by itself, on a blank line, between "work address:" and the address I had already added. It even used a font style that didn't match the surounding text.
개발자 답글
일 년 전에 게시됨Thanks for your feedback. LanguageTool doesn't autocomplete - the autocompletion came from somewhere else (e.g., Gmail or a different add-on). We also don't open dialogs automatically, all dialogs only show up when you click on an error or button. Maybe you're confusing LanguageTool with a different add-on? - A year ago, this tool was just a spell and grammar checker. There was no mention of AI on it's home page.
Now it's decided to revamp itself as an "AI tool".
Which means one of two things:
Either it is, genuinely, more of an "AI tool" now than it used to be, in which case it gets an immediate boot from my browser. If it's been an "AI tool" this whole time, training a large language model off my text, I regret not removing it sooner.
Or, they're trying to pick up on the current marketing craze and slap "AI" on their basic spell check and grammar tool which is less insidious than it is annoying and sad.
Either way, it's been real, but nothing that is or claims to be "AI" is allowed on my browser. Seeya.개발자 답글
일 년 전에 게시됨"training a large language model off my text" - we don't do that, and our privacy policy is very clear about how we use the text. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 13502630 님, 일 년 전My big problem is the grammar checker. I just want an extensive spell checker. I write in a very personal style, something this grammar checker doesn't understand. Mrs Patterson, my English language teacher way back in the ninth grade drilled decent grammar into her student. I use it as I choose; I'd rather not have this addon nagging all the time. Just check the spelling.
- 5점 만점에 2점Javiondelo Archelós 님, 2년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 17969946 님, 2년 전Works well, mayor security problem: allText (including passwords you enter) is sent to a server outside of your control. Deleted immediately.
I find it incredible that this is a recommended app. Does mozilla not care about the privacy of its users?개발자 답글
2년 전에 게시됨It's simply not true that password fields are transmitted. Only multi-line text fields are transmitted (and you don't type passwords there). Everyone can easily confirm that by using the debugging tools integrated into Firefox.