Vurdering for Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike av Dmitry Selivanov
92 vurderingar
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av prospectus, 13 dagar sidan"Optional data collection, according to the developer:
Authentication information
Browsing activity
Personally identifying information
Website activity
Website content"
Apparently not "optional" anymore, as I can't use the extension without showing my browsing activity, etc. I have uninstalled this extension until this privacy concern is corrected
EDIT: If is the case that it's a FF enforced label, then the developer should update the description of their extension, because it currently leads the users into believing these are optional permissions, when they are notSvar frå utviklaren
posta 13 dagar sidanThat is not my choice though - it's FF decision to label extension reading YouTube video url as "tracking website activity" - and without these permissions - extension simply can't work - Vurdering: 3 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19754388, 14 dagar sidanArguing with users as a dev is just embarrassing. Doesn't matter if they are ignorant in their assumptions; the new permissions request was always there you are just now being forced to make your data handling more transparent. Doesn't help the explanation of the new preferences reads like it was written by a 2nd grader.
Needless to say, this extension doesn't ACTUALLY take any meaningful "personal information", though it *could* be used to track every video a user watches to build a profile on a user.
You can say you won't, but things change and bad actors have accessed much more critical information before. 3 stars because I haven't witnessed something as sad as those review replies in quite some time.Svar frå utviklaren
posta 13 dagar sidan"Arguing with users as a dev is just embarrassing." - should I ignore factually wrong claims?
"the new permissions request was always there" - it was announced a year ago: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2025/10/23/data-collection-consent-changes-for-new-firefox-extensions/
"though it *could* be used to track every video a user watches to build a profile on a user." -that's pretty obvious, majority of users, though, assume that it now tracks all their actions on all sites - that's the part I dispute. - Vurdering: 3 av 5av 748392833, 18 dagar sidanThe sections of the app's privacy policy that matter to the new permissions:
"On registration, the extension generates a persistent random installation identifier and sends it to the Return
YouTube Dislike API. The identifier is not derived from or linked to a YouTube or Google account, but it is a
persistent identifier and is treated as personal data."
Persistent identifiers can be used to fingerprint users which is likely why it is being treated as personal data here. I am not accusing the author of this, I am just stating that, in the wrong hands, it can be used to fingerprint users.
"When the user submits a Like, Dislike, or vote removal and vote submission is enabled, the extension sends the random installation identifier, video ID, and selected action.
API requests necessarily expose the network IP address and request time. The service uses this information for
security, abuse prevention, aggregate analytics, and operation of the API."
There is more being collected than a random ID and youtube data. Nowhere in the Privacy Policy does it state if this data is being transmitted securely and while it does state that it uses the browser extension to store data and that the data is "processed by the Return YouTube Dislike service and its hosting and
network infrastructure providers" it does not state if, how and how long it is stored on its hosting and
network infrastructure provider. Nor does it state what is stored and if the data is destroyed at any point.
This matters because this information is important to allow users to make an informed choice about installing the app. Those who reside in countries that are governed by the GDPR have a right to request their data. Does the author provide the means to abide by this right? and if so, how may they do this?
"Data is not sold or shared for advertising."
This is good but "Data is not sold or shared in any way" in regards to collected data not associated with Patron or Github would be a better privacy outcome. If you do share data with third parties, please disclose this as users are becoming more and more concerned about privacy and would like to make an informed choice about installing this app.
I have no interest in entertaining any accusations made against the author in regards to the Ukraine/Russian war as the accusations I have seen contain no proof. However, I did see one review stating that the author was "Segregating users" and the author's reply did not deny this, stating "Helping Ukraine defend itself against an aggressor is not “segregation". This is concerning. An IP address can be used to identify a person's origin. I would be interested in knowing how this fits under security and abuse protection?
For the record, I support Ukraine in it's efforts to protect its land and people, and my country both supports and supplies Ukraine in its efforts. I'm not meaning any harm in this review, I am just concerned about privacy.
(One edit was made to correctly quote a statement made by the author.)Svar frå utviklaren
posta 15 dagar sidanThanks for reading the policy this carefully, and for the fair tone - you’re right about the ID. "Anonymous" was the wrong word in my earlier replies. It’s pseudonymous: randomly generated and not derived from or linked to your Google or YouTube account, but it is persistent, which is exactly why the policy treats it as personal data.
On your other points:
- Everything the extension sends to the API goes over HTTPS.
- Like any web server, the API sees your IP address and the request time. They’re used for security, abuse prevention, country-level vote statistics, and running the service. The extension works the same for everyone, whatever their country.
- Vote records are kept while they’re needed to calculate results, keep voting fair, and prevent abuse. The policy doesn’t promise a fixed deletion period.
- For GDPR or other data requests, use https://returnyoutubedislike.com/help.
- Data isn’t sold or used for advertising. Besides the hosting and network providers that run the service, it’s only processed by Patreon or GitHub, and only if you choose to sign in.
The Ukraine remark you quoted was about my personal position on the war, not about how the extension works. - Vurdering: 3 av 5av Firefox-brukar 20240328, 21 dagar sidanI still use old version for now, so far work just fine with some kink. Pretty sure dev are tired to death to remind over and over but people can't help to be skeptical and so do I. Just promise that those data just for function or whatever. It would be ashamed if someone found out you secretly selling data.
Edit: need to clarify "Helping Ukraine defend itself against an aggressor is not “segregation.”" does that mean you know user's nationality? by how exactly? surely not IP address.
I don't know what you going to do with those data and since i live in a country that does support russia, then i just can go fuck myself put me on your blacklist. UNINSTALLSvar frå utviklaren
posta 15 dagar sidanTo clarify: my comment that "Helping Ukraine defend itself against an aggressor is not “segregation.”" was about my personal position on the war, not about how the extension works.
The extension works the same for everyone, whatever their country or nationality - nobody gets blacklisted for where they live. And the data isn't sold. - Vurdering: 3 av 5av idx_zero, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av dontmindmyusernameplz, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av BananaSplit97, 2 månader sidanI can safely say this extension isn't harvesting my data (the developer isn't being insidious in what they're saying, it really is free to check the Github), but this extension isn't really what I downloaded it for anymore.
Opening Youtube to see the new interface that- while I confidently believe is entirely human made- just reads like generic vibe-coded design was offputting. The new window isn't needed and serves as yet another case of "fixing what isn't broken".
The plugin's behavior wasn't consistent anyway, with the like to dislike ratio being dramatically different from what it actually was supposed to be. I reckon one's better off without a plugin like this anyway. When they DO work, it's "kinda sorta".
It still does what it says on the box, even if not perfect, but I think you're better off without from the get.Svar frå utviklaren
posta ein månad sidanThanks for sharing your feedback about the interface.
RYD hasn’t changed how it handles your data. What changed is how Mozilla labels these permissions - not what the extension does with your data.
The same issue is discussed by Ajay, the author of SponsorBlock and DeArrow:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/the-new-data-transmission-permissions-seem-to-be-misleading-to-users/149410
The extension is actually recommended by Mozilla, so they do not consider it harmful or dangerous.
RYD uses only the data it needs to display dislikes and count votes.
Its site permissions cover YouTube and its own API at returnyoutubedislikeapi.com. RYD doesn’t read other websites, and these site permissions cannot be used to access them.
Personally identifiable information - RYD’s randomly generated, anonymous user ID, used to count votes. This isn’t your Google or YouTube account.
Browsing activity - moving to the next YouTube video, so the extension can send its video ID and fetch the new dislike count.
Website content - things like the visible like count, which helps work out dislike estimates.
Website activity - clicking Like or Dislike.
Again, we’re talking about YouTube activity. The extension isn’t watching everything you do across the internet - it simply can’t with these site permissions.
The new labels can sound alarming, but they don’t give the extension access to additional websites.
RYD’s source code is public, so you can check how it works: https://github.com/Anarios/return-youtube-dislike - Vurdering: 3 av 5av Firefox-brukar 19964793, 2 månader sidanI DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON WHEN I WAS NOTIFIED BY YOUTUBE THAT IT WANTED PERSONAL INFO, BUT I WISH THEY'D LIST EXACTLY WHAT IS BEING TAKEN.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 2 månader sidanI understand why you want a clear explanation of those data categories.
RYD hasn’t changed how it handles your data. What changed is how Mozilla labels these permissions - not what the extension does with your data.
The extension is actually recommended by Mozilla, so they do not consider it harmful or dangerous.
The extension only uses the data it needs to show dislikes and count votes.
Its site permissions cover YouTube and its own API at returnyoutubedislikeapi.com. RYD doesn’t read other websites, and these site permissions cannot be used to access them.
Here’s what those permissions mean:
Personally identifiable information - RYD’s randomly generated, anonymous user ID, used to count votes. This isn’t your Google or YouTube account.
Browsing activity - opening the next YouTube video, so the extension can send its video ID and fetch the new dislike count.
Website content - things like the visible like count, which helps calculate dislike estimates.
Website activity - clicking Like or Dislike.
Again, this is about YouTube activity. The extension isn’t watching everything you do across the internet - it simply can’t do that with these site permissions.
The new labels sound scary, but they don’t give the extension access to more websites.
RYD is open source, so you can see how it works: https://github.com/Anarios/return-youtube-dislike - Vurdering: 3 av 5av Garack, 2 månader sidanI didn't mind the Patreon advert at all (gotta pay the relevant costs somehow), but as others mentioned, the addon now requires access to a lot of sensible user data. Three stars because it does work, but the data sharing is not acceptable for me.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 2 månader sidanTLDR: Random user id used for counting votes is personal data by law and by mozillas rules. that's why this warning appears.
Thanks for explaining your concern about the data permissions.
RYD hasn’t changed how it handles your data. What changed is how Mozilla labels these permissions - not what the extension does with your data.
The extension is actually recommended by Mozilla, so they do not consider it harmful or dangerous.
The extension only uses the data it needs to show dislikes and count votes.
Its site permissions cover YouTube and its own API at returnyoutubedislikeapi.com. RYD doesn’t read other websites, and these site permissions cannot be used to access them.
Here’s what those permissions mean:
Personally identifiable information - RYD’s randomly generated, anonymous user ID, used to count votes. This isn’t your Google or YouTube account.
Browsing activity - opening the next YouTube video, so the extension can send its video ID and fetch the new dislike count.
Website content - things like the visible like count, which helps calculate dislike estimates.
Website activity - clicking Like or Dislike.
Again, this is about YouTube activity. The extension isn’t watching everything you do across the internet - it simply can’t do that with these site permissions.
The new labels can be unsettling, but they don’t give the extension access to more websites.
RYD is open source, so you can see how it works: https://github.com/Anarios/return-youtube-dislike - Vurdering: 3 av 5av Techstar01, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av IronEleven, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av saint23thomas, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av TIP_CHACK, 3 månader sidanРаботает в обычном ютубе, но не отображается иконка пальца вниз. В ютуб шортсах дизлайков по прежнему нет
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Rynn21, 3 månader sidanIt worked up till about a month ago. Now, the dislike button is broken. You can't see if you've disliked a video or not, and there's no number or thumbs down count.
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av DeAndre Queary, 4 månader sidanwhy hasn't this been updated for firefox in 2 years? WTF?
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av KevK, 6 månader sidandoesn't work well anymore in 2026, pending the approval of an update
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 6 månader sidanYouTube changed its UI and broke the extension on Firefox. The fixed Firefox update was submitted at the same time as the Chrome update; Chrome review completed faster, while Firefox review is taking longer. It will be available as soon as Mozilla approves it.- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Firefox-brukar 17157185, 7 månader sidanIt has worked great so far, but since a few days ago, the like-dislike ratio bar isnt displayed anymore and the dislike button beneath Youtube videos cannot be pressed anymore. Ergo i cant dislike videos unless i uninstall this addon.
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 6 månader sidanThanks for your support. Version 4.0.0.3 has been submitted for review to the store and fixes this issue. It will be available once the store review is complete. - Vurdering: 3 av 5av Firefox-brukar 18262689, 7 månader sidanAfter yesterday it doesnt work anymore... it shows the dislikes, dont show the thumbs down symbol.... also it dont show (bold black) if i downvote or upvote. if this problem is fixed, you get again 5 stars and a donation
Svar frå utviklaren
posta 6 månader sidanVersion 4.0.0.3 has been submitted for review to the store and fixes this issue. It will be available once the store review is complete. - Vurdering: 3 av 5av Sn@gZ, 8 månader sidanНа шкале лайков/дизлайков перестала отображаться серая часть с дизлайками. В настройках функция "Раскрасьте кнопки" тоже не работает. Версия Firefox - 115.33.0esr (64-битная).
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Firefox-brukar 13519206, eit år sidan
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Diesel_Wolf, eit år sidanNo Longer Works, Aug. 14th 2025. No Icon, All Values are Set to 0 Dislikes??? That could be YouTube doing that, but IDK?
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Stickson, eit år sidanSlows down the entire site during use. It's useful to know when a crappy video is not worth watching, but man, I can't deal with the slowness.
- Vurdering: 3 av 5av Traplock, 2 år sidanReturn YouTube Dislike is triggering YouTube adblocker detection. It was working fine until recently but now I have to disable the app otherwise I'm blocked from watching videos.