Análises de FireMonkey
FireMonkey por erosman
62 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Alexander A., há um mêsIs it possible, by any chance, at some point, to get something like uBlock's procedural cosmetic filters for our UserCSS scripts? CSS is great, but it's a bit lacking in functionality, especially in regex support.
I'm only starting to learn JS, and I imagine it's gonna take a while before I'll be able to write the scripts I need.
Thanks for all your hard work! - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Crend King, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Adán, há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por ecompton59, há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por jackyzy823, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Grano, há 7 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 14571563 do Firefox, há 2 anos
- The UI is much better and more intuitive than that of TemperMonkey.
I really like the distinction between CSS and JS modifications and that I don’t need to use “proprietary” GreaseMonkey functions like GM_addStyle (` /* the CSS goes here */ `).
FireMonkey also doesn’t exhibit the bug that TemperMonkey does — when I navigated the same portal over many pages, it seemed TM kept adding the same CSS script over and over, which, over time, slowed Firefox noticeably (after a while TM reported aplying about 70 scripts instead of 2!). - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Frantishek, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Ben SALT.id, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por emacsomancer, há 2 anosIt is indeed super lightweight. A nice advantage to being on Firefox, as it's not available elsewhere.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por serotonin_2a, há 2 anos