Análises para FireMonkey
FireMonkey por erosman
62 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Alexander A. , há 25 diasIs it possible, by any chance, at some point, to get something like uBlock's procedural cosmetic filters for our UserCSS scripts? CSS is great, but it's a bit lacking in functionality, especially in regex support.
I'm only starting to learn JS, and I imagine it's gonna take a while before I'll be able to write the scripts I need.
Thanks for all your hard work! - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Crend King , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Adán , há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por ecompton59 , há 4 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por jackyzy823 , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Grano , há 7 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14571563 , há 2 anos
- The UI is much better and more intuitive than that of TemperMonkey.
I really like the distinction between CSS and JS modifications and that I don’t need to use “proprietary” GreaseMonkey functions like GM_addStyle (` /* the CSS goes here */ `).
FireMonkey also doesn’t exhibit the bug that TemperMonkey does — when I navigated the same portal over many pages, it seemed TM kept adding the same CSS script over and over, which, over time, slowed Firefox noticeably (after a while TM reported aplying about 70 scripts instead of 2!). - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Frantishek , há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Ben SALT.id , há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por emacsomancer , há 2 anosIt is indeed super lightweight. A nice advantage to being on Firefox, as it's not available elsewhere.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por serotonin_2a , há 2 anos