Análises para FireShot: Full Web Page Screenshots (♥♥♥♥♥)
FireShot: Full Web Page Screenshots (♥♥♥♥♥) por susbox
133 análises
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por FF user 0 , há 24 diasIt can only capture the visable part. I hope it can provide a functional capture selection and functional capture entire page for the Chat GPT web site.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19038959 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Encore , há 2 mesesJako první jsem to zkusil na delší stránce na webu theadultman.com a nefungovalo to.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Fohsap , há 2 mesesWhy does it ask to access all_urls? Just press ctrl+shift+i and go to the inspector settings (press f1 here) and go to Available Toolbox Buttons and turn on full-page screenshot. No need for risking your privacy and data. Scary extensions be damned.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12547617 , há 2 mesesIt is misleading addon. It presents itself as Full Web Page Screenshots but even that most basic functionality is behind paywall. Even Firefox's basic screenshot functionality is better.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Maggle , há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13588392 , há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por adamhybel , há 3 mesesFireShot is incredibly effective for capturing webpages, and its core functionality is genuinely useful and much appreciated.
However, I'm giving it 1 star due to a critical issue: it is closed-source. This lack of transparency is a major concern. We, the users, cannot verify the code we are running in our browsers. This presents potential security and privacy risks, as there's no way to audit the extension for hidden tracking or malicious behaviour. Trust requires transparency.
I genuinely love what this extension does, and I would instantly change my rating to 5 stars if the developers embraced free and open-source principles.
I strongly urge other users to request this change as well. Open source is vital for user security and trust in browser extensions. Developers, please consider making FireShot open-source. The concept is fantastic, but its closed nature prevents a wholehearted recommendation. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por u12 , há 4 mesesThey don't even allow cropping in the editor in the free version. That's like if the free version of Microsoft Word didn't allow you to type words. They know this is shameful, so they don't even mention it on their "pro vs free comparison" page: https ://getfireshot .com/upgraded .php
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18836439 , há 5 mesesIn the free version all links in PDF lead to their side. Therefore useless.
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Tobias , há 5 mesesWhen my PC crashed, I had to reinstall Windows and my key was lost.
When I wrote to support, I received a 30 day code!
Even after several emails, there was no response.
CAUTION ! - Avaliado em 1 de 5por personpersonperson , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18754116 , há 7 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por lIllIl , há 8 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por hrab.wesol , há um ano
- Pros: can scroll Protected PDF on the Google Drive when the builtin screenshot tool or other addon can't.
Cons: The hard sell to the Pro version is too off-putting. Especially this bullshit dishonest statement: "Only a small part of this page can be saved *due to browser limitations*. You can use FireShot Pro to save the entire page to PDF". So it's my browser's fault that the whole page cannot be saved, but if I upgrade to Pro, even using the same browser, the page will be able to be saved? Are we supposed to be dumb to accept that statement?
Uninstalled at the end. I will search for other addons that can do Protected PDF scrolling.