Análises para Corretor Gramatical e Ortográfico - LanguageTool
Corretor Gramatical e Ortográfico - LanguageTool por LanguageTooler GmbH
104 análises
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19020014 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18473034 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18632880 , há um mêsdoes its job well but I hate that I cannot turn off the badge that shows off "advanced writing errors" in the small dropdown because it's extremely distracting to me. I understand the purpose of it is to persuade people into getting the premium version to see what "advanced writing errors" they've made, and I quite frankly feel a bit disrespected by it.
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Shahin , há 2 mesesIt's perfect for English, but for my language "Arabic" it sucks, and I can't even disable checking in Arabic and keep giving false positives and wrong destructive suggestions even I've added English as the only language for detection and checked the box underneath, but still annoying me with Arabic false errors, and wrong suggestions, please fix!
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18732210 , há 4 mesesIt works and does what it promises, but could have a bit better UX, and be a bit more polished as it caused a few bugs in a few sites in the past year that I have been using it, but tbh a lot of the blame goes on the horrible browser-plugin API's...
But still, recommended! - Avaliado em 3 de 5por lee terry , há 4 mesesIt is better than nothing but is often not great at spelling mistakes. I will misspell the word literally as literly and it will not give the word I want as a suggestion but when I search that word the search engine corrects me fine (there have been other words too but this was the most recent). Plus, the addon does not work in some places (like here for example).
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por spootboot2 , há 5 mesesI am just so sick of not having any spell check/grammar check software catch anything, even if it is behind a paywall like this one. Originally, I was just relying on the spell check on MS Word to catch things on my graduate papers before submitting them, but it that was useless. So I added a different extension add-on for Word and used both to no avail. They still missed stuff. So I downloaded the Language Tool extension and realized that it would catch more advanced mistakes if you paid for it... I am in the process of working on my Master's capstone, so I need all the help I can get. I pay for it and add it to MS Word. Tell me why all three of those spell checks don't catch when there is a duplicate word?? Or a missing period at the end of a sentence?? Or even when there is a jumble of words together that don't make sense like, 'before the in study was performed...". What is the point of me paying for the advanced version of LT if it still will not catch even the simplest mistakes? Maybe I am expecting too much.
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por nicknolt , há 5 mesesне полный архив. Мало слов. Правильное слово выделяет как ошибку!!! Повелся на - Грамматика
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por juanD , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Marc , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por LimeRed17 , há 5 mesesGetting the following error in Nextjs 15.1.7 app only due to this extension. Fixed when I disabled this extension. Please fix this asap:
Hydration failed because the server rendered HTML didn't match the client. As a result this tree will be regenerated on the client. This can happen if a SSR-ed Client Component used.
- A server/client branch `if (typeof window !== 'undefined')`.
- Variable input such as `Date.now()` or `Math.random()` which changes each time it's called.
- Date formatting in a user's locale which doesn't match the server.
- External changing data without sending a snapshot of it along with the HTML.
- Invalid HTML tag nesting.
It can also happen if the client has a browser extension installed which messes with the HTML before React loaded.
- data-lt-installed="true" - Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18822773 , há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14059993 , há 6 mesesLa extensión funciona genial. Nunca falló su inicio y no lentifica el trabajo, pero la aplicación como corrector textos deja mucho que desear (advierto que utilizo la versión Premiun). No admite formas del castellano para mi región, y no aprende a no señalar esto o siquiera considerarlo. Ofrece ademas un uso desmedido de puntuación, y lo fundamental no se puede buscar para reemplazar un término o carácter, sea uno, o en serie. La IA, aveces sorprende con una construcción. Aveces.
En definitiva, es un corrector para escribir email o demás en tiempo real. Es aquí donde más valor tiene esta aplicación. La falta de un historial de cambios, confirma esto último.
Si es muy útil para dar una idea general y rápida de la calidad de un texto.
Espero que con el tiempo puedan subsanar estps detalles.
Otro detalle importante... Cuando uno acepta que la app corrija, por ejemplo: espacios dobles, o comillas, suele eliminar la palabra adyacente. Es devir no aparta el carácter señalado de la palabra vecina. - Avaliado em 3 de 5por Lawrence , há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por ThatManZam , há 7 mesesI required this extention to keep me on my toes while writing stories on twinery.org/2 , however although errors are highlighted I find it very difficult to activate the pop up that would allow me to correct them. That and when it does work it adds the new word to the existing word rather than overwiting it
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Yekta , há 7 mesescompare to Grammarly is a bit dumb, sometimes it struggle even for easy words.
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Oxilotic. , há 9 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por L. Wi. , há 10 mesesPlease remove the annoying premium upgrade nag screen, it's very attention grabbing and is definitely going to make me uninstall the app faster than actually buying the extended features.
Also the errors tally/bubble keeps blocking my view of the text box, as well as blocking out buttons in the GUI I need to be able to press.
Otherwise, it is very fast and intuitive, I just wish these two things were thought out better before being introduced.