Отзывы на «NoScript»
NoScript от Giorgio Maone
Отзывы robsku
Оценено на 5 из 5
от robsku, 6 лет назадI'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2 475 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Talking_Log, 2 дня назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Kurt, 5 дней назадNoScript is great when you want to block XSS exploits directly! I kinda love this extension!
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18814116, 21 день назадС тих пір, як я почав користуватися цим застосунком кілька років тому, я взагалі не розумію, як я раніше шарився по інтернетах без нього. Більш потужного, гнучкого і надійного інструмента, щоб налаштувати перегляд під себе, я ще не зустрічав. Він вимагає деякого розуміння, що саме показувати, а що саме приховувати, тому plug-and-play для нього не працює - він якраз і потрібен для тонкого налаштування, щоб при відвідуванні рекламних помийок, сумнівних і дуже сумнівних сайтів заблокувати майже все, а потім давати дозволи на відкриття того, що вам потрібно. Тому різниця в перегляді того ж Ютуба через застосунок на смартфоні і через комп в бравзері просто як дві паралельні реальності.
Величезна дяка розробникам за цей чудовий застосунок! o/ - Оценено на 5 из 5от fidgeter, месяц назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от mita mohin, месяц назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 20022895, месяц назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 20067621, месяц назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13527624, месяц назадBye-bye, 'subscribe' js pop-ups!!:P Thanks to devs<3
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 20010645, месяц назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 20048187, 2 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18960744, 2 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Алексей, 2 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от AvHmT, 2 месяца назадHello
Thank you very much for quickly fixing the problem, awesome work, version 13.6.29 works perfectly.
I wish you all the best and good luck.
---------------------------------------
Hello
I remember the beginnings of this extension, the year was 2005, it was a long time ago, since then you have done a lot of work until such a form of the extension was created.
Please, now a problem has arisen, the latest versions of the extension cause problems with loading the youtube page, the page freezes.
I downgraded from version 13.6.28 of the extension to version 13.6.25
Released June 22, 2026, which runs without problems
versions 13.6.28, 13.6.27, 13.6.26 are problematic
I use FF 128.14.0 ESR
Thank you very much for everything
May you be successful - Оценено на 3 из 5от Montalaar, 2 месяца назадUsing it for 5+ years, awesome tool to stop trackers and even certain ads, a must have for me!
The last update broke Youtube with NoScript though: Any video will slow down the entire Firefox tab until it's completely unresponsive and Firefox asks to shut it down due to performance issues.
I did a roll-back to an older Firefox, disabled all my extensions 1-by-1 until Youtube worked again: Without NoScript sadly. - Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19967680, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Private Jenkins, 3 месяца назадFantastic for keeping data-scraping scripts away from my personal info or history.
However, as of June 1st, the add-on will only update the script list once per refresh hit, and I have to click off the icon in order to process more scripts to get a certain page "unbroken".
Very annoying, hence why this is only a 4-star (even barely! I give this add-on a 3.5 in reality) review.
Fix this issue, and the rest of the problems I encounter will again be someone else's problem. - Оценено на 4 из 5от Alphonse, 3 месяца назадStops unknown scripts from running until your approval. But a lot of websites will break without third-party scripts, and for now you simply must guess your own until it works. Interface cuts off long domain-names.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Jeurissen Apps, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от TheOriginator, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19945682, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Екатерина, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18256241, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19917843, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18378924, 4 месяца назадMarktplaats and Bol are not working with this extension.
Had to disable the extension because it prevented me to watch pictures on pages.