Отзывы на «AudD® - Распознавание музыки»
AudD® - Распознавание музыки от AudD, LLC
Отзывы dbaser
Оценено на 4 из 5
от dbaser, 2 года назадChanged my original 1-star review to 4 stars after reading Developer response. I was originally under the impression that this requires Sign Up and is only a Free Trial of an extension. I thought this for a few reasons:
1) Before using, I read other reviews stating the same thing.
2) When I first tried to use it without an API token, it did not find any songs I tried. I then opened Settings and saw a field for an API token and the words "API token, paste it below" and thought that it must not work without an API token. I signed up for the API token (not knowing the API is a separate product) and after creating an account the dashboard shows that the user is on a 2-week Free Trial. I thought this applied to the extension, not the API.
3) There is a link on the main extension page to a Privacy Policy which differed from the one I read on the API dashboard, which further contributed to my impression that it is a paid extension, as I was unaware they are two separate products.
Now that I have read the Developer response, when I go to Settings, I can clearly see that it reads "If you're subscribed to the AudD® Music recognition API and have an API token, paste it below." I didn't notice this at first and thought the API token was required.
I have tried it and you can indeed use the extension to find songs without any API token. I gave the extension four stars instead of five only because the AHA extension is still better at actual song recognition. Thanks for the response developer! My apologies for assuming the worst in my original review.
1) Before using, I read other reviews stating the same thing.
2) When I first tried to use it without an API token, it did not find any songs I tried. I then opened Settings and saw a field for an API token and the words "API token, paste it below" and thought that it must not work without an API token. I signed up for the API token (not knowing the API is a separate product) and after creating an account the dashboard shows that the user is on a 2-week Free Trial. I thought this applied to the extension, not the API.
3) There is a link on the main extension page to a Privacy Policy which differed from the one I read on the API dashboard, which further contributed to my impression that it is a paid extension, as I was unaware they are two separate products.
Now that I have read the Developer response, when I go to Settings, I can clearly see that it reads "If you're subscribed to the AudD® Music recognition API and have an API token, paste it below." I didn't notice this at first and thought the API token was required.
I have tried it and you can indeed use the extension to find songs without any API token. I gave the extension four stars instead of five only because the AHA extension is still better at actual song recognition. Thanks for the response developer! My apologies for assuming the worst in my original review.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 2 года назадApologies for causing confusion; the extension does not require a sign-up. You can use it without an API token. The API token field is for people with an active subscription. The free trial is for our API product and shouldn’t be used in the extension; the extension works without an API account and is completely free.
Extension users are subject to the add-on's privacy policy. Website sign-ups are not required to use the add-on.
(Thanks for taking the time to review! It’s valuable to know people might think a token is required; we’ll make changes to make it clear that it’s not.
Users can also reach us at hello@audd.io).
If there are any particular songs AHA recognizes that we don't, please also let us know- our music recognition accuracy should be higher on average
Extension users are subject to the add-on's privacy policy. Website sign-ups are not required to use the add-on.
(Thanks for taking the time to review! It’s valuable to know people might think a token is required; we’ll make changes to make it clear that it’s not.
Users can also reach us at hello@audd.io).
If there are any particular songs AHA recognizes that we don't, please also let us know- our music recognition accuracy should be higher on average
194 отзыва
- Оценено на 1 из 5от July, 8 дней назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от ELS, 13 дней назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 20013346, 21 день назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Unamelable, 3 месяца назадWas nice free music identifier for firefox. Now requires registration with gmail only (don't allow any other emails).
Datagrabbing trash like that can burn in hell.
I would put 3 stars because sometimes it works-sometimes isn't.
Right now i can't recommend it because now its just another privacy violation service.
USE LIBREZAM INSTEAD! - Оценено на 1 из 5от SoupRice, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от user_7, 3 месяца назадExcellent extension, it met my needs perfectly. It can identify songs directly from YouTube with precision, including some that are not available on streaming platforms.
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19778199, 5 месяцев назадWorks fine at first then requires a subscription to continue working - AVOID!!
I found Librezam is an alternative that doesn't need a subscription to function. - Оценено на 4 из 5от Anon007, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от DeineMudda69, 6 месяцев назадOnly mediocre at recognizing songs. Eventually asks me for an "API token" because my limit was reached. GTFO.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от OKRA, 6 месяцев назадIt works majority of the imes and I install it in every browser I use. No idea why it has only 3 stars, deserves atleast 4 imo.
edit: oh apparently it bugged out a few months back so thats why it has 3 stars. In its current state its a 5 star for me. - Оценено на 1 из 5от Soup, 6 месяцев назадHas not been able to recognize a single song I tried identifying.
- Оценено на 1 из 5от aydro, 7 месяцев назадare you kidding me, you now have to PAY just to use the extension?
get out of my extensions list.Ответ разработчика
размещено 7 месяцев назадA bug, not an intended behavior. We're investigating (thx to a user who reported this on GitHub issues).
Could you please share your browser version? - Оценено на 1 из 5от jjbJXNjkxb, 7 месяцев назадliterally told me to pay up to be able to recognize a song off a single local file on my pc
- Оценено на 1 из 5от centurion 2000, 8 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Alex Reynard, 8 месяцев назадAsking for money for new features? Fine. Changing the main feature of the software, that was previously free, to now being paid-access-only? No. You're gone.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от cobalt, 9 месяцев назадWorks really well with livestreams, its impressive really.
- Оценено на 1 из 5от MiBenn, 9 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19433736, год назад