Recenzie doplnku NoScript
NoScript Autor: Giorgio Maone
Recenzia od používateľa Michael Rabinovsky
Hodnotenie: 2 z 5
autor: Michael Rabinovsky, pred 8 mesiacmiNo Script is an incredibly useful add-on. In the past, I'd have given it five stars; it now gets only two (see issues below). All in all, I'd say it's still better to have it than not, but that's only because there is no better alternative, and there is no difference between having to completely disable it on a page versus not having it at all.
First of all, it would have gotten three due to the issues I list further down, but it gets two because of a major functionality problem that makes it obnoxious to use, and by its admission, not private in private windows.
In the past, when you set it to trust top-level domains, it would automatically set them to temp trusted; however, for whatever reason, it now sets them to "custom," for me, which functions the same as untrusted, and changing it doesn't even refresh the page for you.
The default setting handling is a huge inconvenience, but that is not where the problems end. You cannot restore previous functionality by manually setting the top-level domain to temp trust. To enable scripts on the page, you must set it to trust, which makes it permanently trusted, and keeps a log of every page you visit in private windows. If you try to change it to temp trust and refresh the page, it goes back to "custom."
Besides that, the description for the extension is outdated. Not only does it still mention Flash, but it also claims no loss of functionality when you need it, which is not true. In most cases, enabling some scripts will return the functionality you need, but there are several reasons why that's not always the case.
Sometimes, certain scripts you need will be on sub-domains of the top-level domain, and they need to be enabled separately; however, NoScript doesn't show them because it thinks they are part of the main domain, so you have no way to make the site work without completely disabling the addon for the page.
In other instances, sites won't load all the scripts until they load some other domains. For example, a CDN containing vital scripts might not appear on the list because it's called after an analytics script has run. There is no way to know that unless you enable each script on the list, one by one. The domain doesn't need to be related; it's just something about how the page loads.
First of all, it would have gotten three due to the issues I list further down, but it gets two because of a major functionality problem that makes it obnoxious to use, and by its admission, not private in private windows.
In the past, when you set it to trust top-level domains, it would automatically set them to temp trusted; however, for whatever reason, it now sets them to "custom," for me, which functions the same as untrusted, and changing it doesn't even refresh the page for you.
The default setting handling is a huge inconvenience, but that is not where the problems end. You cannot restore previous functionality by manually setting the top-level domain to temp trust. To enable scripts on the page, you must set it to trust, which makes it permanently trusted, and keeps a log of every page you visit in private windows. If you try to change it to temp trust and refresh the page, it goes back to "custom."
Besides that, the description for the extension is outdated. Not only does it still mention Flash, but it also claims no loss of functionality when you need it, which is not true. In most cases, enabling some scripts will return the functionality you need, but there are several reasons why that's not always the case.
Sometimes, certain scripts you need will be on sub-domains of the top-level domain, and they need to be enabled separately; however, NoScript doesn't show them because it thinks they are part of the main domain, so you have no way to make the site work without completely disabling the addon for the page.
In other instances, sites won't load all the scripts until they load some other domains. For example, a CDN containing vital scripts might not appear on the list because it's called after an analytics script has run. There is no way to know that unless you enable each script on the list, one by one. The domain doesn't need to be related; it's just something about how the page loads.
2 457 recenzií
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19904250, pred 4 hodinami
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19902880, pred dňom
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19898777, pred 3 dňami
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: coyo, pred 4 dňami
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19893903, pred 6 dňami
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Parasite, pred 7 dňamiEssa extensão ela é muito boa e me protegeu de vários malwares por aí, do mesmo jeito que ela bloqueie jogos antigos ela ainda é boa contra malwates
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19885048, pred 11 dňami
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19882925, pred 12 dňami
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: ilovefanservice, pred 18 dňamia must have addon for todays bad actors and annoyances
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Shanrya, pred 21 dňami
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19806246, pred mesiacomThis is one of the most distinctive Firefox add-ons for me. To be honest, I'm not using it right now because I'm still learning how to use it more effectively. I'm actually trying to learn more about internet security, and I've noticed that using this add-on is great for protecting your privacy from malicious JavaScript. I highly recommend it. Thank you.
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Heather, pred mesiacomProbably one of the most essential addons for firefox, next to ublock. Great for security but it's recommended to have a tech background cuz the default settings can break many sites.
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Rifat, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: noewaeda, pred 2 mesiacmiit's an essential extension. without it, using the internet is like walking directly into a warzone.
on the strict setting, it makes browsing slightly more clunky due to having to give websites some trust, but it's usually not that big of a deal. - Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Max Rower, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Hodnotenie: 2 z 5autor: fidius, pred 2 mesiacmiI uninstalled this extension because it randomly started interfering with browsing due to some nonsense swipe-style gesture 'feature'. Used to be a good extension but I'm not inclined to trust it anymore.
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 19773062, pred 2 mesiacmiDue to a bug that effected mobile scrolling, I disabled Noscript for a day and discovered what a horrible experience browsing was without it.
It seems the bug is now fixed, and in record time too. Thanks Giorgio. Fantastic extension. - Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: Tsuki, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Hodnotenie: 5 z 5autor: tt, pred 2 mesiacmiNew update gesture feature needs to be removed. Disabling the extention until it's fixed
updating to 5 stars now that gesture feature is turned off by default - Hodnotenie: 1 z 5autor: Kval, pred 2 mesiacmiRemove gestures or add an option to disable this clunky gesture feature in the settings in the next update. Scrolling is impossible with the current update. For this reason alone, I'm removing this very useful extension for now, until they fix this annoying feature.
- Hodnotenie: 1 z 5autor: Radosław, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Hodnotenie: 1 z 5autor: fcat435, pred 2 mesiacmiHad to disable the extension because it prevented me from scrolling on pages.
- Hodnotenie: 2 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 12969656, pred 2 mesiacmiDitch the gesture on mobile function and will be a 5* extension again.
- Hodnotenie: 3 z 5autor: Používateľ Firefoxu - 13428877, pred 2 mesiacmiI use it a lot and it has been a great tool but had to drop the rating after the new gesture system has been added since for a while I had no idea it had been added and it has made browsing a complete hell on mobile because it can't be disabled so I will have to disable the app until then.