Ulfric 的评价
This was a decent add-on that I forgot about and let run wild, but unfortunately the lack of a whitelist means I cannot get much use out of this anymore. For some reason it recently broke Pocket's inline articles, and I found out from the reviews that it breaks certain features in Gmail as well (which I didn't connect to this add-on until now!). Please add a whitelist, or at least more user flexibility in terms of maneuvering through features that may break important website features.
1,005 条评价
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15070452， 5 天前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19173280， 19 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19145735， 23 天前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 LastStar007， 23 天前Sometimes breaks legitimate websites and there's no way to add an exception.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18828191， 1 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13443993， 1 个月前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15758195， 1 个月前So far, it seems to work well. However, it currently doesn't work with Reddit.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19072892， 2 个月前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 david benderradji， 2 个月前
- Warning: Breaks public service login systems
This extension removes critical parameters from URLs used in SAML logins (like RelayState, SAMLRequest), which breaks authentication flows on government websites such as Spain’s SEPE / Cl@ve.
The lack of a domain whitelist makes it too aggressive for practical daily use. Great idea — but the execution is becoming detached from real-world needs. - 评分 5 / 5来自 A. Bilmanda， 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Krisna S. Putra， 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19035234， 2 个月前