Kevin 的回应
开发者回应
发布于 8 年前Thanks for your feedback.
Since the first version of this add-on, we also block tracking domains like doubleclick.net. Rules for these sites are not rational, because the entire page is a tracking "field".
This is the reason why we do not and will never delete complete domain blocking for tracking domains like doubleclick.net.
We also describe this feature since the first version in the description of the add-on, so every knows, what the add-on does.
Since the first version of this add-on, we also block tracking domains like doubleclick.net. Rules for these sites are not rational, because the entire page is a tracking "field".
This is the reason why we do not and will never delete complete domain blocking for tracking domains like doubleclick.net.
We also describe this feature since the first version in the description of the add-on, so every knows, what the add-on does.
1,004 条评价
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19173280， 8 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19145735， 12 天前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 LastStar007， 12 天前Sometimes breaks legitimate websites and there's no way to add an exception.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18828191， 21 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13443993， 24 天前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15758195， 24 天前So far, it seems to work well. However, it currently doesn't work with Reddit.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19072892， 1 个月前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 david benderradji， 1 个月前
- Warning: Breaks public service login systems
This extension removes critical parameters from URLs used in SAML logins (like RelayState, SAMLRequest), which breaks authentication flows on government websites such as Spain’s SEPE / Cl@ve.
The lack of a domain whitelist makes it too aggressive for practical daily use. Great idea — but the execution is becoming detached from real-world needs. - 评分 5 / 5来自 A. Bilmanda， 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Krisna S. Putra， 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19035234， 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19026513， 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18906722， 2 个月前